Skip to main content

@TheBabylonBee FBI Races Past Protesters Screaming ‘Kill The Jews’ To Arrest Woman Praying Silently Outside Abortion Clinic

FBI Races Past Protesters Screaming ‘Kill The Jews’ To Arrest Woman Praying Silently Outside Abortion Clinic buff.ly/409PnOF
Image

Comments

Anonymous said…
Self-criticism is urgently needed in the narratives that appear in a moment of crisis like this. Why do they demand so much a need to choose sides or parties between the Israel-Palestine conflict, in the same example between the Russia-Ukraine conflict? It is true that there is a side with agents who fight against the truth. For example, the Church today is occupied by agents with interests opposed to the Gospel. In this way, the truth of Christ will be blocked by these same agents today. But there is an effort to cover up the norms in the Church to solve the problem of occupation. Because there is clearly a usurper who has turned the Seat of Rome into the Seat of the Antichrist. The choice, therefore, is for truth and peace alone. But many who call themselves Catholics have sought another path.

Renato
Anonymous said…
The truth of Christ is practically blocked today in Rome, not tomorrow – forgive me for the lapse, in the above comment. And just to add to this: we must humbly pray to God today for the situation of the Church today. Because only in this way will we be light to the world of darkness today. We must pray many rosaries, with a contrite spirit of much penance. Because there will certainly be even more crises and revolutions in the four corners of the planet. And this conflict, sooner or later, will extend to the Balkans; and so the Third World War will arise with the Russian initiative to invade Europe, according to the mystics. The latter are always consistent with current events. They demonstrate the enemies of Christ who provoke crises, in the recent example in Ukraine, because of our sins. So we have only God to put our trust in.

Renato

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...