Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from January 21, 2018

Why is the Catholic World Report, when Called Out on Promoting Gay Activists Agendas, Name Calling: "Conspiracy"?

The Catholic World Report (CWR) in an article today allowed gay activists Fr. James Martin and Fr. Thomas Reese to smoke-screen or cover-up that Pope Francis has acted against and "dismantled" the Pope Benedict XVI reforms against predator priests and cover-up bishops. Why is the CWR promoting Reese's claim that there is "no process for judging bishops" when there is a process that has been "dismantled" by the present Pope? (CWR,  "Observers remain "mystified" over Pope's remarks on clerical sex abuse,  and call for bishop accountability," January 26, 2017) [ http://www.catholicworldreport.com/2018/01/26/observers-remain-mystified-over-popes-remarks-on-clerical-sex-abuse-and-call-for-bishop-accountability/ ] What is CWR's real agenda in promoting this smoke-screen? I wrote for NewsMax during the US sex-abuse scandal, before the Benedict reforms, a piece called: "What is VOTF's Real Agenda? " The age

Pope Francis "Dismantled," "Ceased" & Acted Against "Reforms" that were Removing Sex-Abuse Priests & their Cover-up Bishops Instituted by Pope Benedict

Journalist Hilary White, on January 25, reported that Pope Francis has actively "dismantled," "ceased" and acted against "effective" reforms that were removing sex-abuse priests and their cover-up bishops instituted by Pope Benedict XVI: "Pope Benedict installed effective  procedural reforms on clerical sexual abuse; Francis... has all but completely dismantled or reversed those changes... Benedict 'had defrocked or suspended more than 800 priests for past sexual abuse between 2009 and 2012'... His reforms specifically included bishops who refused to act against priest-abusers... 'This Pope has removed two or three bishops per month'... These reforms - and removals - have ceased entirely under Francis." (Remnant, "Special Report: Pope Francis Accused of Inaction in Notorious Sex Abuse Cases," January 25, 2018) The article, moreover, said Francis acted against the Benedict reforms by firing two members of the Congre

Cld. Zen: Francis's Chinese Betrayal is call to "Dialogue with Herod"

Francis and Cardinal Pietro Parolin "demanded the retirement of one bishop and the demotion of another" so that Communist totalitarian controlled state bishops can get control of the underground Chinese Church. The National Review's Michael Dougherty reported what this Vatican betrayal means to the Chinese Catholics in quoting a Chinese underground pewsitter witness to the Communist regime's reign of terror: "Everybody, and I mean everybody, knows someone who was murdered, or tortured, or disappeared to defend the principle that was just abandoned." (National Review, "The Vatican's Deal with China: What to make of Cardinal Parolin's Diplomacy," January 23, 2017) Cardinal Joseph Zen, bishop emeritus of Hong Kong in 2016 said the Francis/Parolin "diplomacy" is like betraying Joseph, Mary and the baby Jesus to the murderous Herod. Cardinal Zen said: "[T]oday would our diplomats advise Joseph to go and humbly beg for

Victim who Declared Pope Francis's Bp. Barros "Witness my own Abuse" & Kissed Predator is a Fortune 500 Executive & Backed up by 30 Priests & 120 Parliament Members

Did Pope Francis slander sex abuse victims of predator Fr. Fernando Karadima who Francis appointed Bishop Juan Barros covered-up for after he witnessed their abuse? Attorney Elizabeth Yore wrote: "Juan Carlos Cruz, now a 51-years-old Fortune 500 executive has repeatedly maintained the culpability of Bishop Barros, "This bishop witnessed my own abuse and that of many other boys over a period of 35 years. Barros was there, and he saw it all." His statement was corroborated by another Karadima victim Dr. James Hamilton, now 49, " I saw how Barros watched it all." Cruz also disclosed... "I saw Karadima and Juan Barros kissing and touching each other." (Remnant, "Vatican Watch... So Much for Pope's Child Protection Commission," July 12, 2016) Yore in the article reported: Over "1300 Catholics in Osorno [the diocese where Francis appointed Barros to be bishop], along with 30 diocesan priests, and 120 members of the Chilean Parli

Was Chile a Trap? Or is Francis another Fly in Parolin's Spiderweb?

Who set up the obvious trap for Pope Francis to go to Chile where he had much to lose and nothing to gain? It appears to some who watch Francis closely that he seems to gives lip service to protecting unborn children and sex-abuse victims, but awards pro-abortionists and protects bishop friends such as for example Chile Bishop Juan Barros who covered-up for a gay priest predator friend as attorney Elizabeth Yore has documented. The trip to Chile was set up by someone who either didn't have Francis's best interests in mind or is oblivious. Who set up the trip? Francis expert John Allen at Crux said "if you want to put something on Francis's agenda... there's only one game in town." ("More and more Parolin's the face of authority in Francis's Vatican," August 10, 2017) That one game is Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin who is the Pope's gatekeeper and "agenda" setter. Did the "agenda" setter set up