Skip to main content

Was Chile a Trap? Or is Francis another Fly in Parolin's Spiderweb?

Who set up the obvious trap for Pope Francis to go to Chile where he had much to lose and nothing to gain?

It appears to some who watch Francis closely that he seems to gives lip service to protecting unborn children and sex-abuse victims, but awards pro-abortionists and protects bishop friends such as for example Chile Bishop Juan Barros who covered-up for a gay priest predator friend as attorney Elizabeth Yore has documented.

The trip to Chile was set up by someone who either didn't have Francis's best interests in mind or is oblivious.

Who set up the trip?

Francis expert John Allen at Crux said "if you want to put something on Francis's agenda... there's only one game in town." ("More and more Parolin's the face of authority in Francis's Vatican," August 10, 2017)

That one game is Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin who is the Pope's gatekeeper and "agenda" setter.

Did the "agenda" setter set up the papal trip to Chile?

It appears to some that the Secretary of State could possibly be a corporate or Church ladder climber.

What possible rung of the ladder could be on the mind of a Vatican Secretary of State?

Sandro Magister said Parolin has a "very realistic chance of becoming" the "next pope." (lancasterdiocese.org, Latest News, October 10, 2017)

The one who stood in Parolin's way in his climb up the ladder before this was Cardinal George Pell who was suppose to reform the Vatican corruption including the Secretary of State's finances.

Parolin according to the Catholic Herald in a "series of power struggles" ended the outside audit and Vatican financial reform "even before" Pell was forced to return to Australia on old sex-abuse allegations. ("How Cardinal Parolin won the Vatican civil war," November 9, 2017)

Who and what stood in the Secretary of State's path before Pell?

The Grand Master of the Knights of Malta Fra' Festing and his Order were in his path.

In a series of power struggles Festing was forced to step down and the Order's sovereignty ended.

OnePeterFive.com posted Vatican expert Edward Pentin "reports that Cardinal Parolin, who seems to be orchestrating a good deal of the Vatican's involvement in the matter" of Malta. ("Malta Besieged: Ancient and Sovereign Order Toppled by Rome," January 26, 2017)

In both the Pell and Malta power struggles dubious and suspicious financial as well as spying actions were taken by a former employee and a present employee of Parolin (Archbishop Becciu and Archbishop Tomaso) according to the OnePeterFive.com article quoted from above and LifeSiteNews.com in its September 28, 2017 article "Former Vatican auditor accused of spying says 'shady games' going on in Rome."

Pray a Our Father now that the Dubia Cardinals and Pope Benedict XVI issue the correction and that Parolin is not the next pope.












Comments

Liam Ronan said…
I pray God publicly rebuke them everyone, the ignorant, the malicious, and the cowardly who allow Almighty God, the Blessed Mother, and the Doctrine of the Holy Catholic Church to be mocked, manipulated, warped, and distorted in such a manner as to substitute man for God.

I pray they be rebuked not that they perish in Hell, but that in rebuking them, God grant them the opportunity to be saved.

Hebrews 12:6 “For whom the Lord loveth, he chastiseth; and he scourgeth every son whom he receiveth….”

Revelation 3:19 “Such as I love, I rebuke and chastise. Be zealous therefore, and do penance….”

Gather your willing Dubia Cardinals, Bishops, and priests together, Cardinal Müller, Bishop Schneider, et. al. however few there be, and have just 1 public Mass offered for that intention, i.e. a public call for God to rebuke those who insult God’s Majesty and the Bride of Christ, as an act of Mercy that they might repent.

Offer that 1 Mass on March 19, 2018, the Feast of St. Joseph the Protector of the Universal Church and the 5th anniversary of Francis’ installation.
Praypraypray said…
Pray! Pray! Pray!

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk