Skip to main content

Pope Francis "Dismantled," "Ceased" & Acted Against "Reforms" that were Removing Sex-Abuse Priests & their Cover-up Bishops Instituted by Pope Benedict

Journalist Hilary White, on January 25, reported that Pope Francis has actively "dismantled," "ceased" and acted against "effective" reforms that were removing sex-abuse priests and their cover-up bishops instituted by Pope Benedict XVI:

"Pope Benedict installed effective  procedural reforms on clerical sexual abuse; Francis... has all but completely dismantled or reversed those changes... Benedict 'had defrocked or suspended more than 800 priests for past sexual abuse between 2009 and 2012'... His reforms specifically included bishops who refused to act against priest-abusers... 'This Pope has removed two or three bishops per month'... These reforms - and removals - have ceased entirely under Francis."
(Remnant, "Special Report: Pope Francis Accused of Inaction in Notorious Sex Abuse Cases," January 25, 2018)

The article, moreover, said Francis acted against the Benedict reforms by firing two members of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) who were removing cover-up bishops of sex-abusing priests:

"A tribunal of bishops, requested by his own sex abuse commission, was ignored and then Francis summarily removed two of the CDF staffers handling such cases, famously refusing to give any reason to CDF Cardinal Muller who was soon to be dismissed."

Unsurprisingly, gay activist and Francis enthusiast Fr. Thomas Reese, covering-up for the Pope's actively acting against the Benedict reforms smoke-screened the truth, saying:

"The fundamental problem is that the church has no process for judging bishops that is transparent and has legitimacy with the public."
(National Catholic Reporter, "Pope Francis' blind spot on sexual abuse," January 25, 2018)

There was a process for not just judging bishops, but for removing them and it was effectively removing them until Francis "dismantled" it.

At this moment, gay activist Reese's smoke-screen article that Francis has a "blind spot on sex abuse" is number one if one googles: Pope Francis.

Francis, it appears, doesn't have a "blind spot," he is actively allowing sex-abuse priests and their cover-up bishops to continue their crimes by dismantling the Bendict reforms.

Pray a Our Father now that the Dubia Cardinals and Pope Benedict XVI issue the correction.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk