Are Socci & Mazza saying If the Benedict Resignation is Valid it brings lawlessness or a State where "the Law is Lost"?
The apparent thesis of Dr. Ed Mazza that Pope Benedict XVI relinquished the power of the Bishop of Rome while remaining the pope (the Successor of Peter) seems to be restating or at least mirroring Antonio Socci's theory. The Socci book theorizes that there would be a "state of exception" which brings lawlessness or a state where "the law is lost" if the Benedict resignation is valid. Both use the quoted phrase a "state of exception" in their thesis. (Taylor Marshall Show, "Is Pope Benedict XVI still (but Francis is Bishop of Rome?) Mazza Thesis Revisited," 1;23:38) Socci in his book appears to be making the case that for Benedict XVI's resignation to be valid then "the entire juridical order" may have to be invalidated where "the law is lost." Benedict's resignation said: "[M]y strengths... are no longer suited to the adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry." For theologian and cano