The Catholic Monitor

Frequent guest co-host on Dr. Taylor Marshall's YouTube TnT show Fr. David Nix stated: "Bishop Gracida of Texas is a great hero of mine for publicly questioning the valid resignation of Pope Benedict. I know for a fact that at least one other Cardinal in the world is questioning this, too." (PadrePeregrino.org, "Courage over Consequentialism in the Hierarchy," March, 3, 2019) Pray an Our Father now that that cardinal receive the grace of courage to join Bishop René Gracida in calling for an cardinal investigation into the Pope Benedict resignation and the Francis conclave.

Dr. Taylor Marshall in his book "Infiltration" on page 239 wrote: "Catholics are obliged to attend only those Masses that commemorate the true pope... Any Mass that does not commemorate the true pope... is de facto schismatic." However, St. Bernard of Clairvaux did not attend only those Masses that commemorat[ed] the true pope [according to the majority of the cardinals of the time]... [Moreover,] [a]ny Mass that does not commemorate the true pope [according to the majority of cardinals of the time]... is de facto schismatic" apparently according to the reasoning of Marshall and that appears to be a problem for him. Does this mean that Doctor of the Church St. Bernard was "de facto" a "schismatic" according to Dr. Marshall? Since it appears to be a 100% belief beyond doubt of Marshall, similar to his Twitter collaborator One Peter Five's Steve Skojec, that Francis's papacy is valid beyond question and if anyone doubts it the

  Updated June 19, 2020     - Vatican I expert Fr. Chad Ripperger, PhD, in his book "Magister Authority" shows that almost all Francis apologists be they liberal, conservative or traditionalist are "proximate to heresy": "[T]reating ALL papal statements as if they are infallible... is proximate to heresy because it rejects the precise formulation of the conditions of infallibility as laid out in Vatican I... by essentially saying the pope is infallible regardless of conditions..." "... Worse still, those who were to follow a pope who was in error in a non-infallible teaching which is taught contrary to something that is infallible is not, therefore, excused." (Magisterial Authority, Pages 5-14) At times, I have found that the comments in the Catholic Monitor comment section are better than my post. This was true of the last post in which Jack  wrote a deeply insightful comment that mirrored Fr. Rippinger's above explanation of Vatican

It appears that One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec's infallible opinion that the Francis papacy cannot be invalid under any circumstances is leading him towards heresy. Yesterday on Twitter, Skojec said to @JoshuaPotryus and @MikeJon: "The problem is that infallibility appears to be tautological at best and borders on superstition at worst." A example of a tautology is former Vice President Dan Quayle's: "If we do not succeed, we run the risk of failure." A possible Skojec tautology might go: "If Francis is not a valid pope, we run the risk of Francis being a antipope" which may lead to this possible Skojec tautology: "I believe Vatican I's papal infallibly teaching "appears... [to border] on superstition," so I accept as true that that infallible dogma "appears... [to border]" on being a unfounded belief." It appears that Skojec's logic goes something like the following: &

We are in the greatest crisis in the history of the Church because Francis and his pro-gay bishops network who make the immoral Borgia popes and their inner circles look like choir boys are creating gay heretical cardinals in a attempt to make a permanent gay heretical church. As a priest recently said even if we can get the Church or state to remove all the bad men, Francis is only going to replace them with worse men. Of course, we must continue to work for the removal of Francis's immoral pro-gay bishops network, but the only way we are going to begin a real restoration of the Church is to remove Francis as well as all his controllers and collaborators. There is only one bishop in the Church actively working toward the removal of Francis. He is Bishop Rene Henry Gracida. Whether he acknowledges it or not, Bishop Gracida is our St. Athanasius. Athanasius virtually alone, except for the faithful laity, lead the resistance against the Arian heresy in the fourth century