Skip to main content

Pope Innocent III: A Pope can be Judged for Heresy

Here is the answer from a POPE to all the Francis apologists who claim that a heretical pope can't be judged by the Church.

This is especially for Dr. Taylor Marshall, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, Steve Skojec, Mark Shea as well as all his Patheos collaborators and all the assorted liberal to conservative to traditionalist Francis apologists.

Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) in "Si Papa":

"'Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprimand a Pope on account of faults, for he whose duty it is to judge all men cannot be judged by anybody, unless he should be called to the task of having deviated from the faith. (Si Papa)'"

"Pope Innocent III: 'For me the faith is so necessary that, whereas for other sins my only judge is God, for the slightest sin in the matter of the faith I could be judged by the Church.' (propter solum peccatum quod in fide commititur possem ab Ecclesia judican)"
(The Remnant, "Answering a Sedevacantist Critic," March 18, 2015)

Always remember:

"Whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin " - James 4:17

All you Catholic cardinals, bishops, priests, pundits, religious, and laity read this passage carefully because your eternal salvation of Heaven or Hell may be in the balance. Pray God gives you the grace and courage to do the "right thing" despite the consequences in this temporary world. You can fool men, but you can't fool God.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

Aqua said…
I believe this is true as if my soul depends on it. Which it does.

Go back and search ancient writings, you will find no one accepted into the Magisterium that contradicts Pope Innocent III.

That is the Magisterial measuring stick - the Truth Detector.
Therese said…
"...unless he should be called to the task of having deviated from the faith."

It seems to me that many have read this passage but are neglecting to quote it in full. What could possibly be the reason? (No, please don't reply. It's sadly obvious.)
BrotherBeowulf said…
In this case Francis was never a Pope from the gitgo due to the defective resignation of Pope Benedict.

By which he resigned from the active ministry but not the munus and passive/contemplative/suffering ministry. Thus Pope Benedict tried to bifurcate and expand the office of the papacy as confirmed and detailed with Pope Benedict’s approval in May 2016 by Archbishop Ganswein.

Not for one nanosecond has George the Mad Bergoglio, Antipope Francis, the ‘pope’ of Stang, been the true Vicar of Christ on earth.

Popular posts from this blog

"Exorcist Fr. Ripperger is asking everyone to say this Prayer until the Election is Resolved"

A good friend of the Catholic Monitor got this from a group message. She said "exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger is asking everyone to say this prayer until the election is resolved": Prayer of Command In His Name and by the power of His Cross and Blood, I ask Jesus to bind any evil spirits, forces and powers of the earth, air, fire, or water, of the netherworld and the satanic forces of nature.  By the power of the Holy Spirit and by His authority, I ask Jesus Christ to break any curses, hexes, or spells and send them back to where they came from, if it be His Holy Will.  I beseech Thee Lord Jesus to protect us by pouring Thy Precious Blood on us (my family, etc.), which Thou hast shed for us and I ask Thee to command that any departing spirits leave quietly, without disturbance, and go straight to Thy Cross to dispose of as Thou sees fit.  I ask Thee to bind any demonic interaction, interplay, or communications.  I place N. (Person, place or thing) under the protectio

High-profile Lawyer Barnes: Amy Coney Barrett would be a Disaster

High-profile trial lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Amy Coney Barrett would be a disaster. The Barnes Twitter report shows that Coney Barrett has " sid[ed] with the government on the lockdowns, on uncompensated takings, on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations... [and] exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in "public health" or "emergency" cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps... [and] hid behind precedent... to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech ." The Avvo.com lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right. This is why he left the prestigious Yale Law School, whom publicly stated their unwill

If Kamala Harris' Father is part White & part Jamaican African and her Mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black?

  Is Joe Biden's running mate really Black? If Kamala Harris' father is part white and part Jamaican African and her mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black? Reason.com tries to figure it out: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's pick to be the Democratic Party's vice-presidential nominee, is the daughter of an Indian immigrant mother and a Jamaican immigrant father. Her father, as I understand it, has ancestors of both European and African origin. [Welcome new Volokh readers. FYI, I've been working on a book on the American Law of Race, with this forthcoming article the first relevant output. My own opinion is that Ms. Harris should be deemed American, period, but there is no such box on government forms, and if you decline to state your race, someone will decide for you… First things first. There is no multiracial or mixed-race category in American law in any jurisdiction. Nor is there an Indian category. So Harris cannot be legally Indian, nor can she b