Skip to main content

Flashback: Why are the "Conservative" Breitbart and Bp. Barron pushing the Agenda of Gay Activist Archbishop Gregory?

Jun 18, 2018 — Abp. Wilton Gregory allows a gay-friendly parish to march in LGBT pride parade every year. You are not signed in as a Premium ...

Why is the "conservative" Breitbart pushing the agenda of gay activist Archbishop Wilton Gregory against conservative and traditional Catholics?


"Speaking at a November 21 panel at Georgetown University titled 'The Francis Factor Today,' Archbishop Gregory said that Catholic resistance to the agenda of Pope Francis is 'insidious' and is aggravated by the use of social media that provides a bullhorn to [conservative] critics."
[https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019/11/23/d-c-archbishop-decries-opposition-movement-pope-francis/]

Why is the "conservative" Bishop Robert Barron joining Breitbart in pushing the gay activist archbishop's agenda?

The May 13, 2018 Catholic Standard reported that the so-called conservative, who is a "friend" of gay activist Fr. James Martin, Bishop Robert Barron has been closely associated with homosexuals who apparently are and were part the gay bishops network.
(Twitter, Fr. James Martin, April 30, 2012, Martin: "Here is my friend Fr. Robert Barron")

Barron's "first spiritual director when he was a seminarian for the [Bernardin] Archdiocese of Chicago" and "friend" was the reportedly homosexual and gay activist Wilton Gregory.

The Standard, also, says he was ordained by the reportedly homosexual and gay activist Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. The article shows Barron giddy in praise of the two gay activists:

"'Cardinal Bernardin's qualities... have shaped the ministry of Archbishop Gregory'... Barron said that his friend Archbishop Gregory is a excellent choice to lead Archdiocese of Washington. 'I can't think of anyone better'... in the wake of the abuse crisis, he said."
(Catholic Standard, "Friends remember how Archbishop Gregory's Chicago years shaped his ministry," May 13, 2019)

Barron, however, doesn't disclose in his praise of Gregory and Bernardin that they were apparently part of "a network of gay priests and bishops" in Chicago according to whistleblowers.

Nor does he explain how a gay activist archbishop is a "excellent choice" to stop gay predators who are responsible for almost all the priest sex abuse cases.

Here is the evidence:

The ex-priest and psychotherapist Richard Sipes, who outed ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick as a homosexual sexual predator, in 2006 outed as a "homosexual" Pope Francis's newly appointed archbishop of Washington, D.C. Wilton Gregory.
(AWRSipes.com, "Sexual Orientation & American Roman Catholic Bishops," August 1, 2006 and Catholic News Agency, "Archbishop Gregory asked to lead Washington archdiocese," March 28, 2019)

It is well-known that Gregory has a deep-seated gay agenda who according to a LifeSiteNews report on August 14, 2018 has appointed a " pro-gay priest as a 'spiritual guide' for abuse victims" despite the fact that the 2011 John Jay report found 81 percent of abuse victims were male.

Joe Sacerdo reported Gregory's gay lobby connections and beginnings :

"Joseph Kellenyi... once a seminarian at Mundelein in the Chicago area... Says:... '[Cardinal Joseph] Bernardin fostered and promoted a network of gay priests and bishops... they protected each other, covered up each other's 'mistakes,'... Bishop Gregory is well aware that he is where he is today because a gay Cardinal [Bernardin] took a special interest in him at a young age. Bishop Gregory benefited directly from a combination of homosexuality and power in the Church.'"
(BryanHehirExposed.wordpress.com, "Fr. Bryan Hehir, Bishop Kicanas, and Cardinal Bernardin," 8 years ago)

It is a scandal that Francis according to whistleblower Sipe has appointed a "homosexual" bishop to Washington, D.C. and that Barron praised his choice.

The scandal gets worst when it is well-known that the Francis appointed bishop has a gay agenda and gay lobby history when 81 percent of abuse victims were males abused by gay predator priests.

Bizarrely and circumstantially in his gay agenda episcopal behavior, Gregory is exhibiting a behavior that Francis is known to practice.

Francis is known to promote homosexual perverts such as Theodore McCarrick to positions of higher responsibility.

The latest example is his personal friend Archbishop Gustavo Zanchetta who was promoted to a high Vatican position even though according to Argentinean Church documents he is allegedly a gay pervert.

Gregory has acted like Francis in at least one of his promotions. The one example that is explicitly known is when Gregory's priest "Fr. Juan Areiza, got entangled in a gay scandal exposed by CBS Atlanta." This same gay pervert priest was later promoted to be "pastor of St. Pius... by Wilton Gregory."
(The American Spectator, "FrancisChurch goes from  Scandal to Scandal," November 4, 2018)

It would be laughable if it was wasn't scandalous that Barron claims that gay activist Gregory and Francis, who is a promoter of gay perverts as well as gay activists, can or might do anything to end the "network of gay priests and bishops."

Read the Barron quote and weep as you laugh at its ridiculousness:

"I would suggest... the Holy Father [Francis]... form a team [probably with Gregory on the team]... to determine how Archbishop McCarrick managed... to function as a roving ambassador for the [Francis] Church and to have disproportionate influence on the appointment of bishops [even though Francis knew he was a homosexual predator]."
(Word on Fire, "The McCarrick Mess, August 9, 2018)

The question needs to be asked:

Is Bishop Barron an enabler in the "conservative" wing of the Bernardin/Gregory gay mafia?

Comments

I do not like Bishop Barron. He wants to be the new Fulton Sheen, but he hasn't got the chops.
I suspect he is having pressure put on him to conform to the gay agenda in the Church. I note he has become more critical of late of those who oppose the gay agenda.
Perhaps he is angling to be appointed to Philadelphia.
Sendero said…
In the recent docu-drama, The Devil and Father Amorth, an answer Bishop Barron provided to the interviewer struck me as troubling. He stated that he could not see himself becoming an exorcist because that role requires living a holy life of which he is not suited for.
Fr. VF said…
I would give the same answer! All the men who ARE exorcists have given the same answer when first requested to do exorcisms. So I wouldn't use that particular tid-bit against Barron.
Badcatholic said…
Brietbart is ok with the “gay” agenda, like many of the otherwise conservatives. People like Barron give them cover. Francis vetted him, be assured.
Georgia said…
Right so how about all the rest as to him? How about Bernardin--Satanist homopredator?--used fraud and lies to get the Sacrilege of Communion in the Hand normalized in the USA = fact. Accused of attending black masses and sexually abusing 2 children there and other homopredations. What are your thoughts Father? Any insights as to Bernardin and his spawn?
Fr. VF said…
Bernardin was probably perfectly possessed.
Fr. VF said…
I don't think Breitbart was promoting Gregory. I think they were exposing him.
Fred Martinez said…
Please read the Breitbart article.
Tom Healey said…
Giving the "same answer" is your response as self-justification for the spiritual mediocrity that plagues the church in the era of the ubiquitous heresy of modernism.

Original Sin comes to mind(which the conciliar popes seem to have downplayed with PF as the consummation of their being seduced by the preposterous optimism of the 20th Century) and what i perceive as the requirement of low expectations, that peculiar offspring of religious "indifferentism"which the modernism heresy has done so much to cultivate.

No-one expects much in the way of a demanding and rigorous Catholic Faith, least of all Bishop Barron, and those bishops who are not queer themselves nor enablers are so mediocre as to be an embarrasement.

No-one is saved, no-one sees God face-to- face without "holiness"..no-one "is suited" for that "role".....it takes a great inflow of Sanctifying Grace and much suffering. That is the way, the primary way by which the church will be restored to her rightful glory.
Fr. VF said…
Nonsense. The answer Barron gave was what any humble man would give. You have no access to my mind or soul, and therefore no grounds for telling me what my nefarious motives are.
Fr. VF said…
Breitbart knows their audience knows that Bergoglio is a sleaze. Quoting Wilton's slobbering over Bergoglio reveals that Wilton is a fellow sleaze.
Gays are the perfect instruments of Francis and his agenda. They tighten his power grip on the Church because they completely depend on his favor. As soon as he sees fit they can be dismissed, exactly because they are gay. They are blackmailable material and accusations against them can be levelled at any time. Francis will protect them as long as they perfectly obey him.
Tom Healey said…
Nonsense?? You're missing the point. I assume Bp Barron is "sincere", but deluded. It would be ridiculous to think that he is intentionally dishonest.

Unfortunately, the darkened intellect, one of the bitter fruits of Original Sin, is at work in his soul thus dishonesty is universal.

And like countless Catholics, he doesn't get the irony and the tragedy of the natural revulsion against holiness without which we can never see God face-to-face.

The church teaches infallibly the default doctrine of Purgatory for just about every Catholic soul that dies in the State of Grace.
Sendero said…
The point I attempted to make and obviously failed, is that Bishop Barron's answer was that he need not strive to live such a holy life. I also had my wife watch the docu-drama without discussing my insight. At the end, I asked her what she thought of the production. She replied to me the same insight, she was most troubled that Bishop Barron strongly implied he did not view striving to live a holy life as his calling as Bishop.

The secular interviewer predictably congratulated the bishop for his "humbleness". In my view, if a man with a vocation opts not to strive to live a holy life to potentially aid the souls of others with the apparent humble excuse that he is only an administrator; then perhaps we can deduce that bishops see themselves exempted from such an effort. That would explain much.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...