Skip to main content

Fr. Nix: Indefectibility of the Catholic Church.."reason that a true Catholic with a good will..would fear coming to the same conclusion on the papacy as Archbishop Viganó did would be the indefectibility of the Catholic Church"

Padre Peregrino (Fr. Dave Nix)
On The Indefectibility of the Catholic Church in this Crisis

Comments

Anonymous said…
No matter how you try to slice it, if Vatican II taught heresy, the Church defected. So since is impossible for the Church to defect, then VaticanII did not teach heresy.
10:47 PM
Fred Martinez said…
It was like in the time of the Arian heresy there were semi-Arians who promoted ambiguous teachings that could be interpreted heretically or in an orthodox way.
11:45 PM
Renato said…
Any Catholic of good will who uses reason can never agree with Viganò. The archbishop affirms several errors because he believes that a Vicar of Christ can be a heretic. But Pope Pius IX dogmatically defined this perpetual indefectibility in the Church, particularly in the person of Peter. An indefectibility that leads to a continuity that consequently both connect in the visibility of the Church. This is the reason why there is no canonical or theological solution because all this is a divine guarantee about the Church of Christ. And Bergoglio is an example of several heresies for not having the assistance of the Holy Spirit as a result of an illegitimate election in his pontificate.
12:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more