Is Voris' Soul in Danger for saying there "are Whispers & Quiet Chatter all over Rome... that the Conclave which Elected Pope Francis might have been Invalid"?
There are whispers and quiet chatter all over Rome just days before the controversial Amazon Synod kicks off that the conclave which elected Pope Francis might have been invalid; a very close second to the talk of an invalid conclave is that Francis may have committed heresy. - Michael Voris [https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pre-synod-report-invalid-conclave-or-heresy]
“Finally, one cannot consider as schismatics those who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person suspect or, because of widespread rumors, doubtfully elected (as happened after the election of Urban VI), or who would resist him as a civil authority and not as pastor of the Church.”
(Wernz-Vidal, Ius Canonicum [Rome: Gregorian 1937], 7:398,)
Does Voris---or his Opus Dei cult mind-controllers---even care? Absolutely not.
You know, one of the reasons people distrust mainstream news is because they do not put out news and information. Instead, the mainstream news' primary function is to manipulate. To control. To push the emotions of the masses. Mainstream news is the Pravda of the empire.
And yet, sadly, CMTV have become this very thing. More interested in manipulating the people, rather than simply being truthful with them. Hit pieces and gaslighting. That is what they have become known for. No different from the mainstream news. But, you know, Voris DID once say he wanted CMTV to be the next Fox News. I guess they're following the model. - The Catholic Monitor [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/10/is-voris-soul-in-danger-for-saying.html]
After reading the above quote where Church Militant's Michael Voris said in 2019, in a post titled "Pre-Synod Report: Invalid Conclave or Heresy?", that there were "whispers and quiet chatter all over Rome ... that the conclave which elected Pope Francis might have been invalid," I found it humorous that Voris recently stated:
Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell.
None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope.
If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation, anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die.
Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more clicks, we drove people away from the Church by planting serious doubts in their minds — that we became the stumbling block for them in never receiving the Body and Blood of Lord Jesus Christ?
Catholics who believe the Faith can also end up in Hell. [https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-grave-papal-sin]
Does this mean according to Voris that his soul may be in danger for what he said as well as his friends in Rome who "whisper[ed" to him "all over Rome... that the conclave which elected Pope Francis might have been invalid"?
That said, here is a flashback post from 2019 with a 2020 update on "Voris' Report that people in Rome think Francis may be an Antipope":
Br. Alexis Bugnolo confirmed journalist Michael Voris' report that people in Rome think Francis may be an antipope.
Br. Bugnolo wrote:
"In fact, if you walk down the streets in Italy and ask whether they think Benedict or Francis is a true pope, 60% will say Benedict... Only those who don't believe the faith say Bergoglio."
(From Rome, "Benedict's End Game is to save the Church from Freemasonry, January 12, 2020, comment section)
Church Militant veteran reporter Michael Voris who was in Rome to cover the Amazon Synod reported there were "whispers and quiet chatter" that Francis may be a antipope:
"[A]ll over Rome just days before the controversial Amazon Synod kicks off [there are "whispers"] that the conclave which elected Pope Francis might have been an invalid conclave... Quiet dinner conversions are punctuated with topics about whether the conclave that elected him [Francis] was valid."
(Church Militant, "Pre-Synod Report: Invalid Conclave or Heresy?", October 3 2019)
Veteran reporter Voris apparently is confirming that Bishop Rene Gracida's call for a imperfect council of cardinals to investigate the validity of the Francis conclave and the Pope Benedict XVI resignation may be being "whispered... all over Rome" possibly even by cardinals.
Is it possible that Voris has heard cardinals in "whisperings" questioning if Francis is a antipope because of a invalid conclave or for other reasons?
It is known "for a fact" according to former frequent guest co-host on the Taylor Marshall TnT YouTube show Fr. David Nix that a cardinal who is known by the co-host is questioning the validity of the Francis papacy:
"Bishop Gracida of Texas is a great hero of mine for publicly questioning the valid resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. I know for fact that at least one other Cardinal in the world is questioning this, too."
(PadrePeregrino.org, "Courage over Consequentialism in the Hierarchy," March 3, 2019)
By coincidence, just a few mouths ago, Voris was interviewed by Fr. Nix in a podcast on his Padre Peregrino website
(Padre Peregrino.org, "Glad Trad 6.2: Michael Voris' 2018 Stories Revisited," May 19, 2019)
Before or after the interview might Fr. Nix have conveyed who the "Cardinal" is questioning Francis's validity to the journalist Voris?
Might Fr. Nix's "Cardinal" be one of those "whispering" to Voris that Francis may be a antipope?
Moreover, Voris according to researcher Randy Engel has connections to Opus Dei which is the next most powerful player in Vatican politics after Cardinal Angelo Sodano's Vatican Old Guard and the Vatican Gay Lobby.
If it is true that Voris is connected to Opus Dei and he is openly reporting that "all over Rome" there are "whispers" of a Francis "invalid conclave" then it appears that a imperfect council to investigate if Francis is a antipope may not be far off.
Remember that there are many cardinals in the Opus Dei orbit.
This may be the beginnings of a war of Opus Dei against the Vatican Gay Lobby who together with the Old Guard were behind the election of Francis. Moreover, Francis may now have a two front war with Opus Dei and the Sodano Old Guard since Francis stabbed Sodano in the back by firing him.
It appears a imperfect council may be a real possibility because even the well funded Francis "traditionalist" One Peter Five Steve Skojec who is afraid to answer my five Dubia questions to him against his pro-Francis nonsensical "Universial Acceptance" half baked idea is panicking.
The non-journalist and increasingly hysterical Skojec, who last year according to Fr. Nix was a phone friend, has actually attacked Nix's "hero" Bishop Gracida as well as real journalist Voris on his reporting from Rome because of the possibility of the Gracida call for a imperfect council coming into actualization.
(PadrePeregrino.org, "The Best Day of my Priesthood," August 15, 2018, Fr. Nix speaks of a phone conversation with Skojec.) [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/10/might-tnts-fr-nixs-cardinal-been-one-of.html]
Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.