Is it possible to give 5 Dubia Questions to Pope Benedict in Front of Live Cameras & not to "'The Benedict Bot'... apparently Manufactured... by others in the [Francis] Vatican"?
The photo with Ratzinger's “black eye ...
Ratzinger vs. The Benedict Bot: A case ...
Islam_Is_Islam said…
I don't know, Fred. From where I sit having moral certainty that Benedict never renounced the munus, it seems to me that this is how your 5 Dubia could be truthfully answered by Pope Benedict XVI:
1. No, Francis should not resign. (How can he resign that which he has never held?)
2. No, as I've said over and over and over, my decision to do what I did was freely made.
3.
No, no investigation of that meeting in March 2013 needs to be done.
(After all that has been revealed since then, you think those guys were the ones "whose competence it was" to call a conclave?!)
4. No. I resigned what I intended to resign. There is one pope. (HA!)
5.
Yes, absolutely, yes. And now all the world knows, too. (And a heretic
can never be pope or Jesus lied which would make Him a jerk for giving
"binding and losing powers" to a heretic.)
What question to ask was implied by Fr Nicolas Gruner in 2014: "Whose name do you say in the te igitur? There is only one 'N' not two." Side stepping answers could go on and on and on. Perhaps THE
Dubia would be along the lines of: "Knowing as you do the requirements
of Canon 332.2, did you renounce the papal office in accord with it on
Feb 11, 2013?" - The Catholic Monitor [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/04/5-dubia-questions-for-pope-benedict-xvi.html]
Gloria.tv
reported that "Cardinal Robert Sarah paid a visit to the “Holy Father
Benedict XVI, Pope Emeritus” on April 24, 2021, he wrote on Twitter.com":
"Sarah
speaks diplomatically of 'an atmosphere of serene and dignified
brotherhood, with the exchange of beautiful mutual memories.'" [https://www.gloria.tv/post/Ae4E3P8JgGoG69iSatg9McX27]
Some call these occasional reported visits with and "interviews" of Benedict with the sometimes photo ops: "The Benedict Bot."
This
is because they seem staged pro-Francis propaganda like the Soviet show
trials of the Cold War era.The pre-Francis Benedict seems to some to
have disappeared and been replaced by someone who is never allowed to
speak in front of live cameras or disagree with things which he,
pre-Francis, was documented to have disagreed with.
Why doesn't the Francis Vatican let Benedict speak in front of live cameras?
This
takes me back to 2019, when a similar question was implied by a
Catholic Monitor commenter about Benedict having a live "press
conference" in "public"
June 6, 2019 was the day that the Catholic Monitor posted 5 Dubia
questions for One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec to answer and like
Francis he has refused, to this day, to answer.
Skojec was banned from posting in the Monitor comment section until he
allowed a free forum for debate on those Dubia questions on the One
Peter Five website comment section.
As far as we can see, there is still no freedom to debate at that
website, but a priest and others banned there as well as a Italian Latin
language expert and supporters of Skojec (one of the 1P5 publisher
supporters is a blogger) carried on a debate for two days in the
Catholic Monitor.
[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2019/06/5-dubia-questions-for-steve-skojec.html]
It was beautiful to see honest debate.
In the debate, Jonathan D'Souza posted a "Dubia for Benedict." Please go to the post link above to read it.
I loved the idea so here are the Catholic Monitor's 5 Dubia questions for Pope Benedict.
But, before we get to the dubia questions, I want to say that I totally
agree with D'Souza that Benedict has to "come out to our faces in the
public and answer in a press conference once and for all... and [be]
drilled by lawyers and reporters in more detail, allow[ing] no room for
escape."
Moreover, as he said "we don't want any more bogus press releases from
the Vatican" which some are calling Francis's "Benedict Bot."
Francis and the Vatican as he said "can't be trusted" as proven by
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, Lettergate, the Chinese Vatican betrayal
deal, the Bergoglio Argentine sex-abuse cover-ups dating to when he was a
archbishop to the present Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta case and I could
keep going, but you get the idea.
Finally, here are the 5 Dubia questions for Benedict:
1. Viganò and the evidence has proven that Francis covered-up for
ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick's sex abuse. Do you demand with Viganò
that Francis resign? Answer: yes or no.
2. In reference to the possibility of Francis resigning, Cardinal Walter
Kasper and canon law expert Nicholas Cafardi said "a political faction"
attempting "a forced resignation would be invalid."
It is known that three Cardinals made a "300 page dossier" of Vatican
sexual homosexual deviancy that was paired with financial irregularities
tied to Vatileaks orchestrated by the allied financially corrupt
Vatican Old Guard diplomats and the Vatican sexually corrupt Gay Lobby
that led to your resignation.
Do you admit that the aforementioned "political factions" orchestrated and caused or forced your resignation? Answer: yes or no.
3. Bishop René Gracida has convincingly demonstrated that there is valid
evidence that Pope John Paul II's conclave constitution "Universi
Dominici Gregis" which "prescribe[d]... [the] method for the election of
his successor(s)" was violated and must be investigated by Cardinals.
Do you admit that the Cardinals need to investigate the conclave? Answer: yes or no.
4. Respected Catholic scholar Dr. Peter Kwasniewski in reviewing the
Antonio Socci book "The Secret of Benedict XVI: Is he still Pope?" said:
"Socci['s]... careful analysis... above all, the interpretation [of]
canon lawyers... argue that the resignation lacks several conditions for
validity."
Do you admit that you need to do a new resignation which is unarguably and incontrovertibly valid? Answer: yes or no.
5. Your long time friend and colleague Cardinal Walter Brandmuller said
"Whoever thinks that persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion
are compatible is a heretic and promotes schism."
Since Francis endorses "that persistent adultery and reception of Holy
Communion are compatible" with his Argentine letter and since his
Vatican calls the letter "authentic magisterium," do you admit that
Francis is "a heretic and promotes schism"? Answer: yes or no.
Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.
by Br. Alexis Bugnolo
After my revelations that I had been threatened over the phone by Archbishop Ganswein, the revelations which burst out from Archbishop Viganò and others in January about the duplicity of the private secretary of Pope Benedict XVI, shed real light on the need to review all the statements alleged to be from Pope Benedict XVI after February 2013, as to their authenticity. (See links in this paragraph for pertinent articles about this).
Editor’s Note: The phrase, “The Benedict Bot”, as used above in the title of the present article, is a term coined by Frank Walker, editor of Canon212.com, and used to characterized the apparently manufactured and artificial statements by others in the Vatican, which are attributed by the Vatican Press Office to the Roman Pontiff, in such wise as to raise grave concerns whether they are in any way an authentic expression of his mind. Thus the Benedict Bot is the persona created by the Vatican. This term obviously refers to a theory of interpretation, because without video confirmation that Pope Benedict XVI has said something, the matter is always capable of doubt, especially after the Vatican has been caught twice falsifying the letter and statements of Pope Benedict, as FromRome.Info has reported previously, not to mention every translation of his Declaration of Feb. 11, 2013. [https://www.fromrome.info/2020/05/27/ratzinger-vs-the-benedict-bot-a-case-in-point-the-3rd-secret-of-fatima/]