Skip to main content

Retired CA & AZ Police Chief in Epoch Times "EXCLUSIVE: New Jan. 6 Bodycam Videos Show DC Police Officer... use of force 'Indefensible' & the Internal-affairs Investigation of... Death a 'Clear and Convincing Coverup'” & Was the "January 6 Insurrection [a] Hoax" that is "comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident"?

EXCLUSIVE: New Jan. 6 Bodycam Videos Show DC Police Officer Assaulting  Unconscious Protester

How did Hitler consolidate power?

Confirmed: Liz Cheney’s J6 Committee Is Now Holding Onto Evidence that FBI Was Running Operatives During the Jan. 6 Protests — WILL THEY LIE ABOUT THIS TOO? - The Gateway Pundit

JAN 6 POLITICAL PRISONERS DENIED HOLY COMMUNION IF THEY REFUSE TO DEATHVAXX THEMSELVES - Canon 212

"Historian Dr. Mazza said that Pope Benedict resigned on February 28 which is the date that Hitler ended free speech and constitutional rights in Germany which brought 'lawlessness' to that country." - The Catholic Monitor

The Epoch Times reported that "Use-of-force expert Stanley Kephart" stated in an "EXCLUSIVE: New Jan. 6 Bodycam Videos Show DC Police Officer... use of force [was] 'indefensible' and the Internal-affairs Investigation of Boyland’s Death a 'clear and convincing coverup'”:

A District of Columbia police officer used a large wooden stick to strike the body and head of protester Rosanne Boyland three times as she lay motionless on the ground on Jan. 6, 2021, according to bodycam footage from several officers obtained by The Epoch Times.

Use-of-force expert Stanley Kephart, upon reviewing the previously unreleased footage, concluded that the three full-force blows by D.C. police officer Lila Morris constituted a felony assault with intent to cause great bodily harm.

Kephart called Morris’s use of force “indefensible” and the internal-affairs investigation of Boyland’s death a “clear and convincing coverup.”

“I think that the first thing that occurred is an assault under the color of authority by Morris,” Kephart told The Epoch Times. “That is a crime, an arrestable offense.” [https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-jan-6-bodycam-footage-shows-officer-repeatedly-striking-unconscious-protester-with-wooden-stick_4430813.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2022-04-30&mktids=e976bf135ac54f997c335da04c7b04b1&est=3i%2FcEmuBBSqPSzED8JH66znUw90dVBoMFUsGLWttHW0HKvIA2iA2bDarFvuh]

The use-of-force expert Kephart has held the following positions: "Security Administrator,1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games; Retired CA & AZ Police Chief and California Undersheriff; CEO, Intelligence Based Integrated Security Systems; Major Disaster Command and Crime Scene Operations’ Experience; Governor’s Commendation as Special Adviser to California Adjutant General for Law Enforcement Training." [https://www.sfbar.org/roe/stan-l-kephart/] 

Moreover, the editor and publisher of The New Criterion and publisher of Encounter Books, Roger Kimball, illustrated that "The January 6 Insurrection [is a] Hoax" with "political prisoners":

Notwithstanding all the hysterical rhetoric surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, two critical things stand out. The first is that what happened was much more hoax than insurrection. In fact, in my judgment, it wasn’t an insurrection at all. Antichrist

An “insurrection,” as the dictionary will tell you, is a violent uprising against a government or other established authority. Unlike the violent riots that swept the country in the summer of 2020—riots that caused some $2 billion in property damage and claimed more than 20 lives—the January 6 protest at the Capitol building in Washington, D.C. lasted a few hours, caused minimal damage, and the only person directly killed was an unarmed female Trump supporter who was shot by a Capitol Police officer...

... Ashli Babbitt, the long-serving Air Force veteran who was shot and killed by a nervous Capitol Police officer. Babbitt was a useful prop when the media was in overdrive describing the January 6 events as an “armed insurrection” in which wild Trump supporters, supposedly at Trump’s instigation, attacked the Capitol with the intention of overturning the 2020 election.

According to that narrative, five people, including Babbitt, died in the skirmish. Moreover, it was said, Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was bludgeoned to death by a raging Trump supporter wielding a fire extinguisher. That gem of a story about the fire extinguisher, reported in our former paper of record, The New York Times, was instantly picked up by other media outlets and spread like a Chinese virus. 

Of course, it is absolutely critical to the Democratic Party narrative that the January 6 incident be made to seem as violent and crazed as possible. Hence the comparisons to 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Civil War. Only thus can pro-Trump Americans be excluded from “our democracy” by being branded as “domestic extremists” if not, indeed, “domestic terrorists.”

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution accords American citizens the right to a speedy trial. But most of the political prisoners of January 6—many of whom have been kept in solitary confinement—are still waiting to be brought to trial. And although the media was full of predictions that they would be found guilty of criminal sedition, none has. 

Indeed, the prosecution’s cases seem to be falling apart. Most of the hundreds who have been arrested are being charged with trespassing. Another charge being leveled against them is “disrupting an official proceeding.” This is a felony charge designed not for ceremonial procedures like the January 6 certification of the vote, but rather for disrupting Congressional inquiries—for example, by shredding documents relevant to a Congressional investigation. It originated during the George W. Bush administration to deal with the Enron case.

The indisputable fact about January 6 is that although five people died at or near the Capitol on that day or soon thereafter, none of these deaths was brought about by the protesters. The shot fired by Capitol Police Officer Michael Byrd that hit Ashli Babbitt in the neck and killed her was the only shot fired at the Capitol that day. No guns were recovered from the Capitol on January 6. Zero.

The liberal commentator Glenn Greenwald further diminished the “armed insurrection” narrative in an important column last February titled “The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot.” The title says it all. Kevin Greeson, Greenwald notes, was killed not by the protesters but died of a heart attack outside the Capitol. Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke that day. Rosanne Boyland, another Trump supporter, was reported by The New York Times to have been inadvertently “killed in a crush of fellow rioters during their attempt to fight through a police line.” But later video shows that, far from that, the police pushed protesters on top of Boyland and would not allow other protesters to pull her out.

Four of the five who died, then, were pro-Trump protesters. And the fifth? Well, that was Officer Sicknick—also a Trump supporter, as it turned out—who, contrary to the false report gone viral of The New York Times, went home, told his family he felt fine, but died a day later from, as The Washington Post eventually and grudgingly reported, “natural causes.” No fire extinguishers were involved in his demise.

***

The January 6 insurrection hoax prompts lots of questions.

Why, for example, did the government mobilize 26,000 federal troops from all across the country to surround “the people’s house” following January 6? Why were those troops subjected to FBI vetting, with some of them sent packing? 

Why is there some 14,000 hours of video footage of the event on January 6 that the government refuses to release? What are they afraid of letting the public see? More scenes of security guards actually opening doors and politely ushering in protesters? More pictures of FBI informants covertly salted among the crowd? [https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/january-6-insurrection-hoax/]

Was the "January 6 Insurrection [a] Hoax" that is "comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident" Day of February 28 (that historian Dr. Edmund Mazza said Pope Benedict XVI resigned on) which allowed Adolf Hitler to bring about a Antichrist-like "lawlessness" in Germany?

The great Candace Owens, who hopefully will be a future president of the United States, said "January 6th is the modern Reichstag fire. A political strategy to remove civil liberties and stomp out all dissent so the nazi party can assume all power, unquestioningly":

It’s just bad acting. January 6th is the modern Reichstag fire. A political strategy to remove civil liberties and stomp out all dissent so the nazi party can assume all power, unquestioningly. Pitiful and obvious to anyone with a thinking brain. [https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1359941714438479880]

Coming from a Catholic perspective, did Pope Benedict XVI's resignation in a mysterious way foreshadow that Joe Biden's January 6th Capitol incident would be like Adolf Hitler's Reichstag Fire incident where free speech and constitutional rights would be lost in America as happened in Germany by resigning on February 28?

Historian Dr. Mazza said that Pope Benedict resigned on February 28 which is the date that Hitler ended free speech and constitutional rights in Germany which brought "lawlessness" to that country.

In a Dr. Taylor Marshall YouTube video, historian Dr. Mazza says that Pope Benedict places great importance of the meaning of historic dates especially the date "that Hitler effectively seized control of the German state by subverting its constitution."

A Reddit - TraditionalCatholics post on this video says Mazza discussed "the way Pope Benedict XVI played with dates. His thesis that Pope Benedict chose the date of 28 February [of the Reichstag Fire Decree] the date of the to end his pontificate is fascinating: it seems to me that the significant of a German Pope choosing the date that Hitler effectively seized control of the German state by subverting its constitution is extremely unlikely to be a coincidence." [https://www.reddit.com/r/TraditionalCatholics/comments/h79358/dr_taylor_marshall_and_dr_ed_mazza_is_pope/] 

Mazza speaking of Benedict's February 28 resignation said on the YouTube video that February 28 is the date of the Reichstag Fire Decree and of "lawlessness":

"Guess what happened on February 28, not 2013, but 1933 [lawlessness], eighty years earlier... the Vicar of Christ is the Kathecon... if the pope is the restrainer or the papacy is the restraining force, what can we expect to happen once he stepped aside or the restraining force steps aside."

"We expect lawlessness."

"The false prophet... prepares the way for the Antichrist. If I'm right guess what happens exactly 80 years ago on that day... the decree of the Reich president for the protection of the [German] people and the state which is known to history as the Reichstag Fire Decree. Here is what happen on February 27, 1933 somebody set fire to the parliament building in Germany... the Nazis took advantage of this and in a few weeks, two weeks, Hitler had full authority in Germany."

"Who was Hitler?"

"A forerunner of the Antichrist."

"And what did the decree do? It suspended the constitution. It created an emergency situation without law." ["Dr Taylor Marshall and Dr Ed Mazza: is Pope Benedict XVI still Pope (but Francis Bishop of Rome)?" 1:20:09- 1:23:15, https://www.reddit.com/r/TraditionalCatholics/comments/h79358/dr_taylor_marshall_and_dr_ed_mazza_is_pope/]

The On This Day website gives a summary of the Reichstag Fire and Reichstag Fire Decree of February 28,1933:

Four weeks after Adolf Hitler was sworn in as the new Chancellor of Germany, the seat of the German Parliament in Berlin, the Reichstag, was burned down. This is one of the most contested and controversial events of Hitler's early years in power, as a mere one day later, Hitler signed the Reichstag Fire Decree which gave his government the legal authority to imprison opponents of the Nazis and suspend many civil liberties in Germany.

The Nazis arrested Marinus van der Lubbe, a Dutch Communist, with setting the fire. He was tried, and executed on January 10, 1934, for the arson act. There has been much debate on whether Lubbe acted alone or whether the Nazis set the fire as a false-flag attack in order to pass the Reichstag Decree and increase their power.

Foremost Nazi historian Ian Kershaw wrote in 1998 that the consensus was that Lubbe had acted alone and that the fire was merely a stroke of luck that the event occurred so the Nazis could use it to their advantage. However, new evidence since then has pointed to the possibility of a Nazi conspiracy. In June 2019 an affidavit in the archives of former investigator Fritz Tobias was discovered. In it Hans-Martin Lennings, an SA operative, claimed in 1955 that he and his SA group drove Lubbe to the scene of the fire - and that the Reichstag was already on fire when they arrived.

Lennings claimed that his team were made to sign a paper denying knowledge of the event, and that they had protested Lubbe's arrest. He later claimed that many involved had been executed but that he had been warned and fled to Czechoslovakia.

Whatever the case, in 2008 a German court posthumously pardoned Lubbe under a law designed to reverse unjust convictions during Nazi persecutions.
[https://www.onthisday.com/photos/reichstag-fire]

Many people believe the false narrative that the media and the Joe Biden Democrats are not taking away free speech when they are monstrously censoring because they have already been sold a bill of goods about the Nazis not being like leftist Democrats and media.

It's not true, but the left and liberals spent a lot of time for this narrative to be built up. Dinesh D'Souza, in his book The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left explains in great detail how and why the media and Democrats are exactly like the Nazis who destroyed free speech and constitutional rights in Germany. [https://www.amazon.com/Big-Lie-Exposing-Roots-American/dp/1621573486]

This strategy is now paying off, if people on the left can get away with censoring the President of the United States they can do the same thing to each one of us (and to you reading this) as happened when civil liberties were lost in Germany which is exactly currently happening in America, right now. ["Democrats Are Drafting Legislation to Criminalize Trump Rallies [Civil Liberties] — Classify Them as 'Domestic Terrorism'”: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/democrats-drafting-legislation-criminalize-trump-rallies-classify-domestic-terrorism/]

What can we do to defeat this monstrous strategy of the Democrats and media elites to criminalize free speech and civil liberties?

What is needed right now, before it is to late, to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to go to outdoor to prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country.

Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost - Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

Francis Notes:

- Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:

"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)


Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

 -  LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"

-  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."

- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes:  

- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

- Tucker Carlson's Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written" according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1
 
- A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1
 
What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: "Anitfa 'Agent Provocateurs'":
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God's Will and to do it.
 
Pray an Our Father now for America.
 
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk