Skip to main content

Followed only in Traditional Latin Mass Parishes with the Most Beautiful Women on Earth: PAPAL DECREE CONCERNING MODESTY..PIUS XI.."MARYLIKE STANDARDS FOR MODESTY IN DRESS"

catholic mass dress code, roman catholic dress code, traditional catholic dress code, proper attire inside church,

Some guidelines to follow.




A PAPAL DECREE CONCERNING MODESTY
HIS HOLINESS POPE PIUS XI

12 January 1930

By virtue of his supreme apostolate, whereby the universal Church is founded, by divine institution, Our Most Holy Lordship, Pope Pius XI nevertires of reiterating the words of St. Paul, to wit: “...women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, ... but as it becometh women professing godliness, with good works...” (I Tim II: 9-10)


Frequently, when the occasion has presented itself, the selfsame Holy
Pontiff has reproved and bitterly condemned immodesty of dress pervasively
introduced into use these days amongst Catholic women and girls, a thing
which not only gravely offends feminine beauty and ornament, but leads most
lamentably to the temporal and worse still the eternal ruin of these same
women and unto the ruin of others still.


It is no wonder then, that the bishops and other ordinaries, as befits the
ministers of Christ, and each in his respective diocese, have opposed, by all
means and with unanimous voice, such misguided license and brazen
impudence, and tolerating the while with calm fortitude, on account of this,
frequent derision and abuse, brought against them by souls of ill will.
So let this sacred consilium of the clergy and of the people, pursue the
same sort of vigilance and action regarding the propagation of discipline as
the holy bishops, with deserved approbation and praise and let it earnestly
exhort these same men that they implement the counsels and the undertakings
begun in due season, and urge them on generously and to the best of their
ability, until this pestiferous sickness be completely rooted out from amongst
the honest affairs of men.
That this aim might be brought the more easily and securely to effect, this
sacred congregation, by the mandate of Our Most Holy Lord, decrees what
follows to be enacted:
1. May parish priests especially, and preachers when the occasion
presents itself, and according to the words of St. Paul “...demand, reprove,
beseech and rebuke...” women to wear clothes that redolent of modesty and
such other things as are the ornament and vanguard of virtue, and may they
warn parents not to permit their children to wear unseemly dress.
2. Parents, being ever mindful of the most awesome obligation which
binds them of caring firstly and foremostly for the moral and religious
education of their children, are to apply particular diligence, that their
daughters be firmly grounded in Christian doctrine and that those same
daughters also zealously foster in their souls, by words and example, the love
of virtues of modesty and chastity; may parents also, in imitation of the Holy
Family, busy themselves about so ordering and governing their family, that
each and every individual within the family home has a cause and incentive to
love and guard modesty.
3. Let those same parents prohibit their children from public athletic
events and gymnastics competitions, or at least, if their daughters must be
involved in them, that they take care to exhibit clothing which is fully in
keeping with modesty and that their parents never permit them to wear
immodest clothing.
4. May the governesses of colleges and instructresses of schools strive so
to imbue the souls of young women with the love of modesty that these same
young women are led efficaciously to modesty of dress.
5. May those same governesses and instructresses, with no exception
even to their own mothers, forbid admission to colleges and schools, to such
women as wear unseemly clothing, and once admitted, if they fail to come to
their senses, that they dismiss them.
6. Let not religious, according to the letters given by the Sacred
Congregation concerning Religious on August 13, 1928, admit young women
into their colleges, schools, oratories, or gymnasia, who do not observe a
Christian manner of dress, or if they have already been admitted, that they not
tolerate those who do not observe a Christian manner of dress. May they
moreover take special pains in the education of their female students, so that
the love of Christian modesty and holy reserve take deep root in their hearts.
7. May pious associations of women be established and fostered,
organizations which, by their counsel, example and deed, set before
themselves the goal of checking the abuse of dress, which is not consistent
with the dictates of Christian modesty, as well as the goal of promoting purity
of morals and modesty of dress.
8. Into the pious associations of women, let not those women be admitted
who put on immodest clothing; and once admitted, if afterwards they commit
a sin in this regard, and come not to their senses when admonished, may be
expelled as well.
9. Women and girls who wear immodest clothes are to be prohibited
from Holy Communion and from the office of sponsor in the sacraments of
Baptism and Confirmation, and in certain cases, they are to be prohibited even
from entry into the church.
10. When feasts occur throughout the year, which supply a particular
opportunity to inculcate Christian modesty, and especially feasts of the
Blessed Virgin Mary, may parish priests and priests of pious associations and
heads of Catholic societies not fail, by means of a sermon for that occasion, to
recall and encourage women, to a Christian manner of dress. Every year year,
on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, let
special prayers in all the cathedrals and parish churches be made, and, where
possible, may timely exhortation be given to the people in the church.
11. May diocesan counsels, discussed in a declaration of the Holy Office
of March 22, 1918, in a spirit of vigilance, and at least once a year, openly deal
with finding ever more suitable means and methods of effectively giving
counsel on feminine modesty.
12. To which point may salutary action, effectively and safely lead. May
bishops and other local ordinaries keep this sacred congregation informed,
every third year, together with a report on religious institution given of our
own accord in letters in the Catholic World on June 29, 1923, even concerning
the condition of things and the state surrounding feminine manner of dress,
and concerning works carried out in accordance with the rule of this
instruction.
THE MARYLIKE STANDARDS FOR MODESTY
IN DRESS

“A dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers
breadth under the pit of the throat; which does not cover the arms at least to
the elbows; and scarcely reaches a bit beyond the knees. Furthermore, dresses
of transparent materials are improper.” (The Cardinal Vicar of Pope Pius XI).
1. Marylike is modest without compromise, “like Mary,” Christ’s mother.
2. Marylike dresses have sleeves extending at least to the elbows; and skirts
reaching below the knees.
[N.B. Because of impossible market conditions quarter-length sleeves are temporarily
tolerated with Ecclesiastical Approval, until Christian womanhood again turns to
Mary as the model of modesty in dress.]
3. Marylike dress requires full coverage for the bodice, chest, shoulders and
back; except for a cut-out about the neck not exceeding two inches below the
neckline in front and in back and corresponding two inches on the
shoulders.
4. Marylike dresses do not admit as modest coverage transparent fabrics 
laces, nets, organdy, nylons, etc.  unless sufficient backing is added.
However, their A PAPAL DECREE CONCERNING MODESTY

HIS HOLINESS POPE PIUS XI

12 January 1930

By virtue of his supreme apostolate, whereby the universal Church is

founded, by divine institution, Our Most Holy Lordship, Pope Pius XI never

tires of reiterating the words of St. Paul, to wit: “...women also in decent

apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, ... but as it

becometh women professing godliness, with good works...” (I Tim II: 9-10)

Frequently, when the occasion has presented itself, the selfsame Holy

Pontiff has reproved and bitterly condemned immodesty of dress pervasively

introduced into use these days amongst Catholic women and girls, a thing

which not only gravely offends feminine beauty and ornament, but leads most

lamentably to the temporal and worse still the eternal ruin of these same

women and unto the ruin of others still.

It is no wonder then, that the bishops and other ordinaries, as befits the

ministers of Christ, and each in his respective diocese, have opposed, by all

means and with unanimous voice, such misguided license and brazen

impudence, and tolerating the while with calm fortitude, on account of this,

frequent derision and abuse, brought against them by souls of ill will.

So let this sacred consilium of the clergy and of the people, pursue the

same sort of vigilance and action regarding the propagation of discipline as

the holy bishops, with deserved approbation and praise and let it earnestly

exhort these same men that they implement the counsels and the undertakings

begun in due season, and urge them on generously and to the best of their

ability, until this pestiferous sickness be completely rooted out from amongst

the honest affairs of men.

That this aim might be brought the more easily and securely to effect, this

sacred congregation, by the mandate of Our Most Holy Lord, decrees what

follows to be enacted:

1. May parish priests especially, and preachers when the occasion

presents itself, and according to the words of St. Paul “...demand, reprove,

beseech and rebuke...” women to wear clothes that redolent of modesty and

such other things as are the ornament and vanguard of virtue, and may they

warn parents not to permit their children to wear unseemly dress.

2. Parents, being ever mindful of the most awesome obligation which

binds them of caring firstly and foremostly for the moral and religious

education of their children, are to apply particular diligence, that their

daughters be firmly grounded in Christian doctrine and that those same

daughters also zealously foster in their souls, by words and example, the love

of virtues of modesty and chastity; may parents also, in imitation of the Holy

Family, busy themselves about so ordering and governing their family, that

each and every individual within the family home has a cause and incentive to

love and guard modesty.

3. Let those same parents prohibit their children from public athletic

events and gymnastics competitions, or at least, if their daughters must be

involved in them, that they take care to exhibit clothing which is fully in

keeping with modesty and that their parents never permit them to wear

immodest clothing.

4. May the governesses of colleges and instructresses of schools strive so

to imbue the souls of young women with the love of modesty that these same

young women are led efficaciously to modesty of dress.

5. May those same governesses and instructresses, with no exception

even to their own mothers, forbid admission to colleges and schools, to such

women as wear unseemly clothing, and once admitted, if they fail to come to

their senses, that they dismiss them.

6. Let not religious, according to the letters given by the Sacred

Congregation concerning Religious on August 13, 1928, admit young women

into their colleges, schools, oratories, or gymnasia, who do not observe a

Christian manner of dress, or if they have already been admitted, that they not

tolerate those who do not observe a Christian manner of dress. May they

moreover take special pains in the education of their female students, so that

the love of Christian modesty and holy reserve take deep root in their hearts.

7. May pious associations of women be established and fostered,

organizations which, by their counsel, example and deed, set before

themselves the goal of checking the abuse of dress, which is not consistent

with the dictates of Christian modesty, as well as the goal of promoting purity

of morals and modesty of dress.

8. Into the pious associations of women, let not those women be admitted

who put on immodest clothing; and once admitted, if afterwards they commit

a sin in this regard, and come not to their senses when admonished, may be

expelled as well.

9. Women and girls who wear immodest clothes are to be prohibited

from Holy Communion and from the office of sponsor in the sacraments of

Baptism and Confirmation, and in certain cases, they are to be prohibited even

from entry into the church.

10. When feasts occur throughout the year, which supply a particular

opportunity to inculcate Christian modesty, and especially feasts of the

Blessed Virgin Mary, may parish priests and priests of pious associations and

heads of Catholic societies not fail, by means of a sermon for that occasion, to

recall and encourage women, to a Christian manner of dress. Every year year,

on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, let

special prayers in all the cathedrals and parish churches be made, and, where

possible, may timely exhortation be given to the people in the church.

11. May diocesan counsels, discussed in a declaration of the Holy Office

of March 22, 1918, in a spirit of vigilance, and at least once a year, openly deal

with finding ever more suitable means and methods of effectively giving

counsel on feminine modesty.

12. To which point may salutary action, effectively and safely lead. May

bishops and other local ordinaries keep this sacred congregation informed,

every third year, together with a report on religious institution given of our

own accord in letters in the Catholic World on June 29, 1923, even concerning

the condition of things and the state surrounding feminine manner of dress,

and concerning works carried out in accordance with the rule of this

instruction.

THE MARYLIKE STANDARDS FOR MODESTY

IN DRESS


“A dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers

breadth under the pit of the throat; which does not cover the arms at least to

the elbows; and scarcely reaches a bit beyond the knees. Furthermore, dresses

of transparent materials are improper.” (The Cardinal Vicar of Pope Pius XI).

1. Marylike is modest without compromise, “like Mary,” Christ’s mother.

2. Marylike dresses have sleeves extending at least to the elbows; and skirts

reaching below the knees.

[N.B. Because of impossible market conditions quarter-length sleeves are temporarily

tolerated with Ecclesiastical Approval, until Christian womanhood again turns to

Mary as the model of modesty in dress.]

3. Marylike dress requires full coverage for the bodice, chest, shoulders and

back; except for a cut-out about the neck not exceeding two inches below the

neckline in front and in back and a corresponding two inches on the

shoulders.

4. Marylike dresses do not admit as modest coverage transparent fabrics —

laces, nets, organdy, nylons, etc. — unless sufficient backing is added.

However, their moderate use as trimmings is acceptable.

5. Marylike dresses do not admit the use improper of flesh-colored fabrics.

6. Marylike dresses conceal rather than reveal the figure of the wearer; they do

not unduly emphasize the parts of the body.

7. Marylike dresses provide full coverage — even after the jacket, the cape or

the stole are removed.

8. Slacks or ‘jeans’ are not to be worn to church.

Marylike fashions are designed to conceal as much of the body as possible

rather than reveal it. This would automatically eliminate such fashions as

tight fitting slacks or ‘jeans’, sweaters, shorts; shorts which do not reach down

at least to the knees; sheer blouses and sleeveless dresses, etc. These Marylike

standards are a guide to instill a sense of modesty. Women and girls who

follow these standards and who look to Mary as their ideal and model will

have no problem of modesty in dress. She who follows these standards will

not be the occasion of sin nor a source of embarrassment or shame to others.

[http://www.olvrc.com/reference/documents/Modesty.Pius.XI.pdf] use as trimmings is acceptable.
5. Marylike dresses do not admit the use improper of flesh-colored fabrics.
6. Marylike dresses conceal rather than reveal the figure of the wearer; they do
not unduly emphasize the parts of the body.
7. Marylike dresses provide full coverage  even after the jacket, the cape or
the stole are removed.
8. Slacks or ‘jeans’ are not to be worn to church.
Marylike fashions are designed to conceal as much of the body as possible
rather than reveal it. This would automatically eliminate such fashions as
tight fitting slacks or ‘jeans’, sweaters, shorts; shorts which do not reach down
at least to the knees; sheer blouses and sleeveless dresses, etc. These Marylike
standards are a guide to instill a sense of modesty. Women and girls who
follow these standards and who look to Mary as their ideal and model will
have no problem of modesty in dress. She who follows these standards will
not be the occasion of sin nor a source of embarrassment or shame to others.
[http://www.olvrc.com/reference/documents/Modesty.Pius.XI.pdf]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...