Skip to main content

@PeterSweden7..Sweden is now going AGAINST cashless agenda..right-wing Swedish government is looking at strengthening the use of physical cash for the future and FORCE shops to accept cash...


HUGE NEWS 🇸🇪 Sweden is now going AGAINST cashless agenda. The right-wing Swedish government is looking at strengthening the use of physical cash for the future and FORCE shops to accept cash. What's going on, is this really happening? Sweden is suddenly doing one good thing after another. Recently they scrapped Agenda 2030 goals from government directives and they also scrapped climate taxes on fuel. Now the new right-wing government is wanting to strengthen the use of physical cash, something that goes against the cashless agenda. The government is appointing an investigator to come up with ideas to support peoples right to pay with physical cash. This could be because some people simply don't want a cashless society, but also to ensure that payments can be done in emergency and crisis situations. "Basically this is about not being excluded from being able to pay" said Niklas Wykman, Minister for Financial Markets. In other words, the Swedish government is looking at FORCING shops to accept cash. This goes against the whole cashless agenda that we have been seeing lately. This new move from Sweden is very good news. Because in a cashless society it would become very easy for the government to control what you can and cannot buy. Paired with a digital ID and a digital wallet, we are looking at a dystopian future where dissidents can be banned from participating in society. Surprisingly, Sweden has suddenly begun to do a lot of things right. Do you support this move from Sweden? 🔴 Help me to EXPOSE the mainstream narrative! The mainstream media is bought and paid for, Bill Gates has donated $319 million to them. I’m independent which is why I can freely bring you stories like this. But I need your help to do it - Become a paid subscriber for only $3 per month to support my work AND get access to in-depth articles that are only available to paid subscribers. Your support means a lot💪
Image

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...