Skip to main content

@LauraLoomer..MORE DEMOCRAT @NikkiHaley donors EXPOSED🚨🚨 NIKKI HALEY IS A DEMOCRAT!..See evidence of those contributions below…


Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
Subscribe
🚨🚨MORE DEMOCRAT
@NikkiHaley
donors EXPOSED🚨🚨 NIKKI HALEY IS A DEMOCRAT! Meet Elliott Badzin. Badzin is the Owner of Factory Motor Parts, and his wife, Marlys Badzin, owns a shoe company called ‘Pumpz and Company’. The Badzin’s have donated over $159,000 to Haley this cycle alone. See evidence of those contributions below… Badzin and his wife have also funded radical Democrats like Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, even supporting Klobuchar’s failed run for President back in 2020. See evidence of those contributions from the Badzin’s to Klobuchar
@amyklobuchar
below… An examination of Nikki Haley’s donors, especially those who have donated to ‘Nikki Haley For President, Inc’, reveals that Haley’s top financial supporters are also donors to some of the most rabid members of the Radical left. Why would those on the left be funding a candidate like Haley, who is reportedly on the ‘Right’? In simple terms, the Left is funding a Haley candidacy, along with the establishment donor wing of the Republican Party, in hopes that they will be able to derail President Trump’s chances of securing the nomination, even though an overwhelming majority of the Republican voter base has clearly stated their support for Trump in 2024. Nikki Haley is a Democrat. The evidence is overwhelming. RECEIPTS! 👇🏻👇🏻
Image
Image
Quote
Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
THREAD 🚨NIKKI HALEY’S DONORS EXPOSED🚨 I have obtained the next months worth of @NikkiHaley fundraiser invites. I’m going to be doing profiles on many of these rich donors (RINOS and Democrats) so you can see who is destroying America by supporting @NikkiHaley’s Presidential…
Show more
from Newark, NJ
286.1K
Views

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more