Skip to main content

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Bergoglio openly thanks press corps for helping to cover up his ubiquitous scandals and crimes

Comments

Anonymous said…
I remember well that Ratzinger was opposed by the same media that he constantly blamed in his pontificate for various polemical narratives, in the example of the same scandals that today the press softens about Bergoglio. Because the pope was purifying the Church, in the example of Summorum Pontificum and in the hand extended to the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X, a gesture for a theological debate for a canonical regularization, on the Church and the question of Vatican II. Benedict XVI confirmed this same negative influence in his last meeting with the priests of his diocese, as Bishop of Rome, before he was forced to leave the Petrine ministry.
Anonymous said…
In fact, Benedict XVI was opposed by the media in his pontificate, but he did not constantly blame the same media in his pontificate. About that last meeting with the priests of his diocese, as Bishop of Rome, he showed his vision, that is, what he was able to witness during the preparation of Vatican II: the media influenced the council in the past whose mentality was opposed to the fathers of the council (in the book The Rhine Flows Into the Tiber, Rev. Ralph M. Wiltgen, in order to verify this information with Ratzinger's information). So it's the same media that softens Bergoglio's scandals today. And there are recorded reports from people close to Dr. G. Gamberini, Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy (for whom there are no books or other media, which I have not been able to find, in English on this) who say that Popes Roncalli and Montini sacrificed themselves to keep the Church alive in the face of the wickedness of the world; which Ratzinger sacrificed himself to keep the Church alive in the face of the goodness of the divine will. It is not new that the truth is not convenient for many.
Anonymous said…
Let us, therefore, connect the dots in this logical puzzle: what does an impediment imposed on Benedict XVI mean?

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...