Skip to main content

@dianemontagna #PopeFrancis’ protégé, DDF Prefect Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, mocks God’s doctrine & law, & mocks Africa, in new interview covering the backlash of Catholic Bishops to the #Vatican declaration on blessing same-sex couples, “Fiducia supplicans”:

Nick Donnelly and Rafael Masiá Tarazona🇪🇸🇵🇱🇭🇺🇻🇦 liked
Diane Montagna
@dianemontagna
#PopeFrancis’ protégé, DDF Prefect Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, mocks God’s doctrine and law, and mocks Africa, in new interview covering the backlash of Catholic Bishops to the #Vatican declaration on blessing same-sex couples, “Fiducia supplicans”: pillarcatholic.com/p/cardinal-fer
Image
Image
7,379
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
Vatican II, with ambiguous texts that did not define any new dogma, placed itself in the hidden demand of a collegiality between the pope and the bishops that only weakened papal sovereignty. Because the pope is unique among the peers who are the bishops.

Pope Paul VI, a former secretary with diplomatic experience in the reign of Pope Pius XII, as reported by Dr G. Gamberini who was a bishop of the Gnostic Church, was forced to sacrifice a tradition for the survival of the Church.

There were three parties on this issue: the traditional, moderator, and radical parties; Montini, with no alternative in order to keep the Church alive against a clear threat, placed himself in the middle group. But the ambiguity continued in a conciliar document that required explanatory notes in order to clarify, something totally unheard of in the Church, but without any successor.

Collegiality is a revolution after the last council in the Church that led the bishops to an episcopal independence over the pope. And many papal orders, for example, Benedict XVI's Summorum Pontificum, have been greatly opposed by the world's bishops.

All this was "evolving" to reach a situation that led to an impediment by the Gnostics, outside and inside the Church, against the reign of Benedict XVI himself.

And the Gnostics are still using subjectives to attack the figure of the pope and the papacy itself, even though the latter legitimate pope is dead.

And Bergoglio and Fernández are two Gnostic demiurges who are destroying the identity of Peter, whose successors have always been concerned with maintaining the unity of the Church, rightly or wrongly, in order to totally destroy the Catholic faith.

And they do it mockingly, the two of them being an antipope and another likely coadjutor antipope soon.
2:44 PM
Anonymous said…
Archbishop Georg Gänswein claims that Benedict XVI is totally impeded from governing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5Z8n38TzNE
2:55 PM
Anonymous said…
They use subterfuge, not "subjective" above.
3:27 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more