Skip to main content

Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio’s ‘blessings’ for homosexual couples show he is a ‘servant of Satan’ Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò says the Vatican’s newly approved blessings for homosexual ‘couples’ show that the ‘Bergoglian hierarchy’ are ‘servants of Satan and his most zealous allies.’

Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio’s ‘blessings’ for homosexual couples show he is a ‘servant of Satan’

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò says the Vatican’s newly approved blessings for homosexual ‘couples’ show that the ‘Bergoglian hierarchy’ are ‘servants of Satan and his most zealous allies.’

Comments

Anonymous said…
We can coldly analyze what Archbishop Viganò tries to say in the last two paragraphs of the article:

"The important thing is that the moderates – defenders of Vatican II – can consider themselves satisfied with that Jesuit handout (in this case, that these spontaneous and non-ritual blessings are not a marriage) that is supposed to save the doctrine of the papacy, while at the same time pressuring souls to condemn themselves."

He says ironically that moderate Catholics, whose justification is to accept the last council, are now satisfied that Bergoglio's Jesuit act is supposed to save the papacy. Near the end of the same article, he implicitly places an act favorable to the good of the Church by Pope Benedict XIV:

"For priests who do not accept to bless these unfortunates, two paths are being prepared: the first, to be expelled from the parish or diocese ad nutum Pontificis; the second, to resign himself to exchanging his right to dissent in exchange for the recognition of the right of approval of the other confreres; something already seen in the liturgical field with Summorum Pontificum".

Then he mentions the liturgical rite before 1955, thus confirming with something despicable on the part of the pope in the not-so-distant past with a Motu Proprio, according to the 1962 missal promulgated by Pope John XIII.

And implicitly, he mentions the "right of approval" which reminds us of the canonical laws in force in the Church linked to Rome.

He does not quote again the Universi Dominici Gregis that could be a solution, according to faith in the Church and in her laws; Priests, however, can safeguard the faith of their faithful entrusted by God by the same constitution.
Anonymous said…
John XXIII And Benedict XVI, correction above what was written.
Anonymous said…
"[...] Bergoglio is supposed to save the papacy..." And then there should be a separation for the other paragraph. Forgive me once again, but it's work and fatigue that cause these lapses...
Anonymous said…
Some priests of the old Ecclesia Dei use the rites of 1955 in the rite of Thursday in Holy Week.
Anonymous said…
If I have not been mistaken, the priests of the Fraternity of St. Peter used the rites before 1955, in Holy Week.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...