Skip to main content

Flashback: Chris Ferrara called for an "Imperfect Council" & his Mentor called Francis an Antipope & Why don't you write a article explaining why you disagree with Fr. Gruner that Francis is an Antipope

On September 17, 2018, Chris Ferrara, president of the American Catholic Lawyers Association wrote an article calling for a "imperfect council" to be enjoined to investigate and possibly "declare" Francis "deposed" from the papacy:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Regarding a probable imperfect council today, the Universi Dominici Gregis says, in article 34, that if the legitimate cardinals declare a vacancy in Rome, any meeting, congregation, council, synod, etc., must be interrupted without delay. Because the same constitution even penalizes them in nullity, even if it is very serious or worthy of special mention, until a new pope is canonically elected. Benedict XVI, in the Motu Proprio on February 22, 2013, gives a deadline of up to 21 days for the conclave to take place. But the problem is that this hypnotic trance called Bergoglio, allowed by God, still prevents the same conclave from taking place. Because the question of canon 332.2 of a "pontificate of a shared Petrine Munus" between Bergoglio and Ratzinger, which canonically never existed, has not yet been seen. And Article 33 says that it cannot be carried out in any other way, nor can the rules be modified, in another article mentioned.
Anonymous said…
I think because of a clear great contempt for the papacy today, the solution will come from the same papacy, through the apostolic constitution of John Paul II.
Anthony Pagano said…
The question posed to Chris Ferrara is most apt, but is unlikely to be answered in the near term. I think Ferrara's intentions are good, but he clings dearly to the mistaken position held and championed by the SSPX since the later days of Archbishop Lefebvre. That is, whether a Pope is a true-Pope or false one should not be raised. And regardless of which he is (Pope or anti-Pope), Church members can act as their own pope and decide which pronouncements of the Pope they shall follow and which they shall not. Sadly this position is both non-Catholic and schismatic. However, in the case of a heretic pope there is no sifting through pronouncements---everything a heretic pope utters to the faithful is tainted.

Barnhardt has sat in this (recognize the Pope but resist him) camp for the longest time and is a relative late-comer to declaring the current occupant of the Papacy a heretic. Barnhardt, even now, longs for the days of Ratzinger whose history she was apparently ignorant of or blind to. Ratzinger was always a progressive modernist who was instrumental in producing and enforcing the Vatican II Constitutions. JPII and Ratzinger presided over (and had a principle hand in) the most spectacular decline in Church History and yet Barnhardt pines for Ratzinger. John XXIII, JPII, and Benedict XVI gave Francis exactly the tools and time needed to do exactly what he is doing now----throwing dirt over what JPII and Ratzinger buried. Am I exaggerating?

Ferrara, in addition to being a Recognize & Resister suffers from a similar blindness. He is under the delusion that he could actually find a conclave of "Catholic" prelates anywhere in the world who would have the willingness or courage to do anything about the public heresy of Francis. Likely since Pius XII priests being raised to the higher ranks of the hierarchy were like minded modernists. Apart from some scattered remnants around the world all Ferrara will likely find are Vatican II-Consiliar Prelates.

Regardless of Father Gruner's position on whether one pope or another was heretical his "Catholic Family News" newspaper was firmly in the SSPX's Recognize & Resist camp---Ferrara was an occasional contributer. I could be mistaken but I saw little evidence in Gruner's writings that he fell into that camp. Furthermore Father Gruner was too single-minded in his life's work----making Our Lady of Fatima better known to the world and convincing the Bishops of the world and the Pope to obey her command. Most complacent Catholics (the majority) wouldn't recognize his name. Among the rest Gruner was either loved or hated. I stand among the former.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...