Skip to main content

@DecreviD2BC..Cardinal @CardinalBCupich & @JamesMartinSJ Celebrate the blessing of sinful unions. African Catholics feel betrayed & their Bishops are furious...

Post

Conversation

Ralph
@RalphieRockz
We now have two religions under the same umbrella courtesy of Bergoglio. This cannot last, either the next pope cleans house or a split occurs. There are too many evil clergy in high positions so my money is on the latter.
18
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
There is indeed much to be discussed about this quality in relation to this same high clergy in the Church today. There is a huge moral crisis between them and this logically leads to an intellectual mediocrity to act.
11:17 AM
Anonymous said…
I was able to verify recently on that question raised by Viganò, an example of great repercussion among conservatives for his real oratory on the crisis in the Church and in the world, in relation to the vice of consensus on the election of Bergoglio.

But this is related only to the performance of the sacrament of matrimony. In the Code of Canon Law, number 1159, it is said that this consent is necessary for the other party to have a valid sacrament.

He should cite was another canon which is number 331 relating to ecclesiastical office correctly on the subject.

And the consensus is thus seen in the Universi Dominici Gregis in a different way, which is cited by him in numbers 87 and 53. This last arctic cited, says that it is necessary for the elected candidate to accept or not the consensus among the cardinal electors on his choice. That's why I put it last to emphasize this well.

It is really necessary to take a good look at the quality of the clergy around us.

Catholics must safeguard their faith, because the tendency is to worsen the chaos for that same clergy who do not understand each other and do not yet resolve the issue of Bergoglio.
1:18 PM
Anonymous said…
Just to correct and make it very clear about the comment above: number 87, in the same constitution above, talks about the consensus among the cardinal electors on the choice of the candidate. Issue 53 is about the trial, in which the archbishop denounces Bergoglio as a contrary agent of the Church – as is well known to all the connection of the Argentine prelate, for example, with the St. Gallen Mafia. Violation of the same Article 53 will lead to Article 76. In the latter, it makes it very clear that the elected candidate loses all prerogative of validity in the conclave held.
2:07 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more