Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
"Modern man, an adult, but at times weak in thought and will, allows himself to be carried away by the hand of the Child of Bethlehem; don't be afraid, trust Him! The life-giving power of its light encourages you to commit yourselves to building a new world order, based on correct ethical and economic relations. Their love guides people and jeopardizes their common awareness of being a "family" called to build relationships of trust and mutual support. Humanity united will be able to face the many troubling problems of the present moment: from the threat of terrorism to the conditions of humiliating poverty in which millions of human beings live, from the proliferation of weapons to pandemics and environmental degradation that puts the future of the planet at risk."
Many Catholics were influenced by this distortion at the time. Above it is clear that this New World Order must be related in ethical relations, in society and even in the economy. Bound by trust, according to the previous paragraph, which allows itself to be led by the hand of the Child of Bethlehem, that is, to Christ.
Very different from Bergoglio's proposal, which now that it is becoming more and more evident who he really is, through his commitment to an order in society aimed at the Devil. So Bergoglio means a New World Order agenda belonging to the darkness of the Antichrist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mTbdPTAuUs
Renato
Renato