Skip to main content

William M. Briggs The Vatican’s New Exhortation On “Climate Change” Has Many Errors

William M. Briggs
The Vatican’s New Exhortation On “Climate Change” Has Many Errors

Comments

Anonymous said…
The first Christmas message of 2005, from the newly elected Vicar of Christ, Benedict XVI was utterly prophetic. But that pronouncement was twisted at the time when he quoted the New World Order:

"Modern man, an adult, but at times weak in thought and will, allows himself to be carried away by the hand of the Child of Bethlehem; don't be afraid, trust Him! The life-giving power of its light encourages you to commit yourselves to building a new world order, based on correct ethical and economic relations. Their love guides people and jeopardizes their common awareness of being a "family" called to build relationships of trust and mutual support. Humanity united will be able to face the many troubling problems of the present moment: from the threat of terrorism to the conditions of humiliating poverty in which millions of human beings live, from the proliferation of weapons to pandemics and environmental degradation that puts the future of the planet at risk."

Many Catholics were influenced by this distortion at the time. Above it is clear that this New World Order must be related in ethical relations, in society and even in the economy. Bound by trust, according to the previous paragraph, which allows itself to be led by the hand of the Child of Bethlehem, that is, to Christ.

Very different from Bergoglio's proposal, which now that it is becoming more and more evident who he really is, through his commitment to an order in society aimed at the Devil. So Bergoglio means a New World Order agenda belonging to the darkness of the Antichrist.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mTbdPTAuUs


Renato
1:01 PM
Anonymous said…
What Benedict XVI did in this pronouncement was a paradox between the two orders. In the example of St. Augustine, whom he mentioned many times, through the City of God and the City of the Devil.

Renato
1:36 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more