Skip to main content

Abyssus Abyssum Invocat (Bp. Gracida) “We must ask ourselves if the 2013 (papal) election was in some way invalidated by a lack of consent”

Abyssus Abyssum Invocat (Bp. Gracida)
  “We must ask ourselves if the 2013 (papal) election was in some way invalidated by a lack of consent”

Comments

Anonymous said…

Bergoglio is not pope because Benedict XVI did not abdicate. In other words, the 2013 conclave is invalid on the merits of the German pope. He left the See of Rome barred to modernists who are part of a Gnostic sect that entered like a smoke from Satan, according to Pope Montini. Because I think it makes sense to demonstrate that the popes' governments have suffered some strange interference in the past. And Bergoglio is yet another strange piece that is part of this same hidden plan that has come to a head today. Because the goal was to usurp and destroy the pontificate. Thus, the 145 members of the College of Cardinals appointed by Jorge Mario Bergoglio are invalid. If the Cardinals do not question what happened in 2013, then they no longer elect legitimate popes with the presence of the new false members of the college. And thus would end the apostolic succession of St. Peter. So, the solution is Universi Dominici Gregis.

Renato
2:21 AM
Anonymous said…
The Bishop Gracida was one of the few members of the episcopate to point out that something was very wrong with Bergoglio. We must pray that more bishops like him will emerge.

Renato
4:15 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more