Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
So let's turn to Tyconius, the fourth-century theologian on the Apocalypse, the final battle between the Church and the Anti-Church. This Discessio, great separation or fall, will not lead to the expulsion of false brethren in the Church. Tyconius says that "it is necessary that the Antichrist be revealed in all the world, and that he also be defeated everywhere by the Church." And this, of course, will even lead to the martyrdom of many. He says, the bishops, under the guise of a gift from the Church, have further advanced the will of the devil.
Then Benedict XVI was forced out by the false brothers of the high modernist clergy, in the example of the St. Gall Mafia. That is why the pope was prevented from reigning. And the prelates of the Anti-Church hastily called an invalid conclave, electing an antipope.
This Synodal Church that will come in October proves that it is the Anti-Church, like a purulent abscess or a cancer. Because it does not have the múnus, that is, sanctifying grace. There is only heresy and apostasy. forced out by the false brothers of the high modernist clergy, in the example of the St. Gall Mafia. That is why the pope was prevented from reigning. And the prelates of the Anti-Church hastily called an invalid conclave, electing an antipope. This Synodal Church that will come in October proves that it is the Anti-Church, like a purulent abscess or a cancer. Because it does not have the múnus, that is, sanctifying grace. There is only heresy and apostasy.
Benedict XVI has withdrew, and the devil's synagogue Appeared. The pope continued that same audience (April 22, 2009) saying: "Augustine read this commentary (Tyconius) and took advantage of it, but he strongly stressed that the Church is in the hands of Christ, his Body remains, forming with him a single subject, participating in the mediation of grace. Therefore, he stresses that the Church can never be separated from Jesus Christ."
Renato
Renato
Renato