Skip to main content

John-Henry Westen @JhWesten Is Pope Francis a valid Pope? Our Lady of Akita warned of a sinister infiltration of the Church, leading to internal divisions. While many saw this as a battle of good versus evil, there’s a surprising twist. lifesitenews.com CLIP

Is Pope Francis a valid Pope? Our Lady of Akita warned of a sinister infiltration of the Church, leading to internal divisions. While many saw this as a battle of good versus evil, there’s a surprising twist.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bergoglio was never pope because Benedict XVI simply never abdicated. And we will have the ability to look beyond with this convinced affirmation. Then, we can easily fit the pieces of this difficult puzzle together and look at what they reveal to us.

So let's turn to Tyconius, the fourth-century theologian on the Apocalypse, the final battle between the Church and the Anti-Church. This Discessio, great separation or fall, will not lead to the expulsion of false brethren in the Church. Tyconius says that "it is necessary that the Antichrist be revealed in all the world, and that he also be defeated everywhere by the Church." And this, of course, will even lead to the martyrdom of many. He says, the bishops, under the guise of a gift from the Church, have further advanced the will of the devil.

Then Benedict XVI was forced out by the false brothers of the high modernist clergy, in the example of the St. Gall Mafia. That is why the pope was prevented from reigning. And the prelates of the Anti-Church hastily called an invalid conclave, electing an antipope.

This Synodal Church that will come in October proves that it is the Anti-Church, like a purulent abscess or a cancer. Because it does not have the múnus, that is, sanctifying grace. There is only heresy and apostasy. forced out by the false brothers of the high modernist clergy, in the example of the St. Gall Mafia. That is why the pope was prevented from reigning. And the prelates of the Anti-Church hastily called an invalid conclave, electing an antipope. This Synodal Church that will come in October proves that it is the Anti-Church, like a purulent abscess or a cancer. Because it does not have the múnus, that is, sanctifying grace. There is only heresy and apostasy.

Benedict XVI has withdrew, and the devil's synagogue Appeared. The pope continued that same audience (April 22, 2009) saying: "Augustine read this commentary (Tyconius) and took advantage of it, but he strongly stressed that the Church is in the hands of Christ, his Body remains, forming with him a single subject, participating in the mediation of grace. Therefore, he stresses that the Church can never be separated from Jesus Christ."

Renato




Anonymous said…
My comment above was poorly governed, repetitive, and perhaps unclear. I was rushed, in the example of the St. Gall Mafia that elected an antipope... Forgive me. But what is above boils down to this: separation will not lead to the expulsion of false brothers as has always occurred. The Church will now withdraw, following the example of the last legitimate pope. Not in the example of the various schisms that have always occurred in history in moments of crisis in the Church. That ended in 2013. Because we are in the end times of all history.

Renato
Anonymous said…
I think I know what will happen. Francis will make everyone on his side of the schism take an oath of loyalty and to avoid excommunication they will be doubly loyal, making excuses.
Anonymous said…
Vigilance is needed on our part (Matthew 24:42-47) in order to gain more light and discernment. Times are bad. Because the false brothers walked in communion with Bergoglio to the wide door of perdition. I think there will be more divisions, confusion and more chaos between them. The recent example is Viganó who recognized Bergoglio as pope before, but affirms this today: all conciliar popes are apostates with the conciliar sect... On the other side, the true brethren walked, like sheep without a shepherd, to the narrow gate of salvation. But God will give us a legitimate pope in the great tribulation. It's up to us to trust.

Renato

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...