Skip to main content

Boycott ALL 666 Cashless Banks: It Begins: Australia’s Fifth-Largest Bank Announces Digital-Only Transactions – Will Phase Out Cash, Cheque, and Phone Payments in All 80 Branches Starting Next Year

It Begins: Australia’s Fifth-Largest Bank Announces Digital-Only Transactions – Will Phase Out Cash, Cheque, and Phone Payments in All 80 Branches Starting Next Year

Comments

Anonymous said…
Is there really 666 banks that exist in Australia? The number has a very clear meaning, if it is really the numbers that there are in the country. The world dominators use the subliminal message a lot in order to pass on a program, as they are part of secret societies.

I read a recent article on 666, according to St. Irenaeus of Lyons, in the fifth book of his work "Against Heresies." He talks about the number of the beast or the antichrist. Irenaeus says, "He [God] kept the name silent, for it is not worthy to be proclaimed by the Holy Spirit." The saint says that probably the antichrist or the beast would last longer if it were proclaimed by God. Because he "was and is no more, and rises from the abyss to perdition." That is why he is called by a number because he is not worthy of being called by a name. This unworthy being is thus hidden. For Revelation says that someone who "was and is not and will come to destruction" is as if he never existed. So God denied his existence since he is prematurely handed over to the judgment of eternal damnation.

Soon this system as much as the beast or antichrist and the false prophet will be the ones to inaugurate the side of fire for 1000 years at the coming of the Lord, before all the others condemned.

We must remember that the Australian government forced all its citizens to get vaccinated, in the years 2020 and 2021, in the "pandemic". Moreover, this tyranny still forced many Australians to go to Auschwitz-style concentration camps. Thus, the country became a true heavyweight. A real prison island. Well in 666 mode.


1:18 PM
Anonymous said…
I don't think the state would define itself as a heavyweight, a boxer who hits hard. But a real nightmare. Something worse. In Bergoglio's example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkQ9FG6G47g
1:45 PM
Anonymous said…
Well, I think everything is clearer now above. It is necessary to be consistent and faithful to the truth.
2:01 PM
Anonymous said…
In Russia alone, according to the Russian media outlet Sputnik, there are 666 banks. I don't know how many banks there are in the United States of America.

https://sputniknewsbr.com.br/20160318/Russia-bancos-666-3853953.html
5:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more