Skip to main content

Archbishop Viganò Stands with Cardinal Müller.."See of Peter is infested by an intolerant and ruthless tyrant: the Bishops must raise their voices before Bergoglio destroys even what ...

1 day ago  The See of Peter is infested by an intolerant and ruthless tyrant: the Bishops must raise their voices before Bergoglio destroys even what ...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Maybe I'm too repetitive. Forgive me my frankness, but if they do not seek an objective solution it will be useless and dangerous. Because that's similar to throwing more gasoline on the fire. Everyone can get burned because the fire is likely to be uncontrollable. And so the fire will destroy even the one who provoked it. If they continue with Bergoglio, the nameless by God who causes only destruction, as St. Irenaeus teaches, then they have all probably fallen into the worst fire, but in eternity. May God deliver them from this fate.

http://www.unavox.it/ArtDiversi/DIV5284_Fra-Giovanni-Maria_Il_senza_nome_in_Malachia.html

https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_22021996_universi-dominici-gregis.html

Renato
Anonymous said…
Viganò has totally lost a logical sense and common sense. He says that all conciliar popes are apostates because they are part of a conciliar sect. But he proves to be a solution to this same conciliar sect, although he received the episcopate of the same conciliar sect. If the last legitimate pope, in his logic until Pius XII, then what sense is there to seek a solution without there being no more apostolic succession since the year 1958 in the last century? I forgive myself once again for my frankness, but I see it only as a controlled opposition. Nothing more.

Renato
Fred Martinez said…
Thank Renato for you comments. They are always interesting. I don't think Viganò is saying all conciliar "popes are apostates because they are part of a conciliar sect." I'm sure he saying something like what I wrote in these posts:

https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/11/is-remnant-wrong-in-saying-francis-is.html

https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/03/if-pope-benedict-was-hegelian-does-that.html

Popular posts from this blog

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

Mary's Secretary - My Spat with Tim Gordon: "Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book  The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever  were  immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest.  I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...