Flashback: Are Bp. Gracida & Bp. Lenga the New St. Athanisuis Bishops? & Might Lenga's former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to declare Francis an Antipope in an Imperfect Council as St. Bernard of Clairvaux's Imperfect Council in France was the first to declared the supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an Antipope?
Are Bp. Gracida & Bp. Lenga Schismatics Like Doctors of the Church:
Might Lenga's former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to declare Francis an antipope in an imperfect council as St. Bernard of Clairvaux's imperfect council in France was the first to declared the supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an antipope?
Is Lenga in schism as some may be stating for claiming Pope Benedict XVI's resignation was invalid thus Francis is an antipope?
It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard claimed the supposed
pope in Rome was an antipope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct
by an imperfect council which he headed. - The Catholic Monitor
Archbishop Jan Lenga was formerly the "Apostlic Administrator" of not only Kazakhstan, but of the tiny country of Turkmenistan.
(Fatima, Russia and Pope John Paul II: How Mary Intervened to Deliver Russia," Page 202)
Interestingly, The Catholic Monitor which has given some coverage to
Archbishop Lenga's position that Francis is an antipope has begun
noticing that the people of Turkmenistan are starting to read the online
Monitor.
Might Lenga's former territory of Turkmenistan be the first country to
declare Francis an antipope in an imperfect council as St. Bernard of
Clairvaux's imperfect council in France was the first to declared the
supposed pope in Rome Anacletus an antipope?
Is Lenga in schism as some may be stating for claiming Pope Benedict XVI's resignation was invalid thus Francis is an antipope?
It must be remembered in history that St. Bernard claimed the supposed
pope in Rome was an antipope as Lenga is doing and was declared correct
by an imperfect council which he headed.
Author Msgr. Leon Cristiani wrote:
"King Louis convoked a Council at Etampes, to consider the question of
the double pontifical election... Bernard was received at Etampes as
God's envoy."
(St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Pages 70-71)
Was St. Bernard in schism?
The Arian heretics were saying the same thing about St. Athanasius. That he was in schism.
The saint was resisting the Arian heretic bishops even apparently outside the valid pope's approval.
It appears that Archbishop Lenga may force the cardinals and bishops to
do an investigation and call an imperfect council into the validity of
the Francis's papacy because a bishop cannot suspend a bishop. Only a
pope can suspend a bishop.
But, Lenga states Benedict is still pope because of a invalid
resignation and therefore Francis isn't pope according to the
archbishop.
Cardinal John Henry Newman it appears showed that a validly appointed bishop can't suspend another validly appointed bishop.
Newman said Athanasius ordained priests against the authority of the Arian heretical bishops who were validly appointed bishops.
In fact, scholar Joseph Bingham on page 98 in "The Antiquities of the Christian Church" said:
"Athanasius... made no scruples to ordain... [Bishop] Euesebius of Samosata... ordained bishops also in Syria and Cilicia."
Moreover, Newman in his "The Development of Christian Doctrine" denied
that Bishop Athanasius's "interference" in the dioceses of the heretical
Arian bishops was schism:
"If interference is a sin, division which is the cause of it is a
greater; but where division is a duty, there can be no sin
interference."
(Gutenberg.org, "An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine," Sixth Edition)
Was Doctor of the Church St. Athanasius a schismatic?
Moreover, serious scholars are claiming Francis is a material heretic.
The 19 Scholar's Open Letter say that Francis is a material heretic
which also brings into play the Bellarmine and Francis de Sales option
of declaring an explicit heretical pope self-deposed.
Bishop Gracida's Open Letter to the Cardinals analysing and quoting Pope
John Paul II's Universi Dominici gregis questions the validity of the
Francis conclave calling for an cardinal investigation into the validity
of the Francis conclave.
Latin language expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo's in-depth thesis "Munus and
Ministerium: A Textual Study of their Usage in the Code of Canon Law of
1983" using exhaustive quotations from canon law showing why canon law
explicitly states that ministerium and munus cannot be synonyms that
mean the exact same thing or nearly the same thing thus denying the
validity of Pope Benedict XVI's resignation.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as
well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the
Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Comments
CHRISTUS SURREXIT!
Why Benedict XVI is still Pope, and Bergoglio never was is simple:
1.) Benedict officially resigned tbe ministerium, but not the munus (office).
2.) Benedict still behaves as Pope by giving Apostolic blessings, using his papal name, etc.
Assuming 1 and 2 were not an issue:
3.) Benedict committed resignation-invalidating substantial error by claiming a bifurcated papacy, w Bergoglio as active member.
4.)
Benedict was also under resignation-invalidating duress when the
Vatican was not able to do electronic financial transactions for a
couple of days, a problem "resolved" the day after his announced
resignation.
Assuming 3 and 4 were not an issue:
5.) There was conclave-invalidating vote canvassing done by the St. Gallen Mafia beforehand.
AND, assuming 5 were not an issue:
6.) Bergoglio is a manifest heretic.(Pacha-demon worship in Vatican, Holy Communion for adulteters, etc., etc., etc. ,etc......)
'Nuff said!