Satanic Corrupt Media: "Judge... Ruled against the [NY]Times in its ongoing attempt to Destroy Independent Journalist... [&] why was the FBI acting like the Bidens’ Private Praetorian Guard"
Today, The Epoch Times reported on the corruption of the so-called mainstream media. It noted that even "a judge in the New York State Supreme Court... has ruled against the [New York] Times in its ongoing attempt to destroy independent journalist James O’Keefe and his Project Veritas":
Further, the 1971 decision by the Supreme Court that allowed the New York Times and the Washington Post to publish the so-called Pentagon Papers—classified documents about the Vietnam War purloined by Daniel Ellsberg, an anti-war analyst working at MIT’s Center for International Studies, and thus stolen property—codified proscriptions against prior restraint. The court ruled that the government could not prevent publication of anything, no matter how illegally obtained. This was defended as “the public’s right to know.”...
...Further, Burger noted: “to me it is hardly believable that a newspaper long regarded as a great institution in American life would fail to perform one of the basic and simple duties of every citizen with respect to the discovery or possession of stolen property or secret government documents. That duty, I had thought perhaps naively—was to report forthwith, to responsible public officers. This duty rests on taxi drivers, Justices, and the New York Times. The consequence of all this melancholy series of events is that we literally do not know what we are acting on.”Now the shoe is on the other foot, and it couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of journalists: a judge in the New York State Supreme Court (despite its name, not the top court in the state) has ruled against the Times in its ongoing attempt to destroy independent journalist James O’Keefe and his Project Veritas by publishing private communications with his lawyers regarding a lost diary purportedly belonging to President Joe Biden’s daughter, Ashley. The Times and Project Veritas have been locked in legal combat since O’Keefe filed a 2020 defamation suit against the Times...
... Well, nothing says “deceptive” like fencing stolen property that serves your ideological needs under the guise of freedom of the press, but here we are. The Times and other legacy media have abused the Pentagon Papers decision for years, often by hiding behind another errant Supreme Court decision involving the Gray Lady, New York Times Co. v Sullivan (1964), which essentially gave newspapers carte blanche to slander their enemies without fear or legal penalty.
The judge in the Ashley Biden diary case, Charles D. Wood, has forbidden the Times to publish the Project Veritas documents—protected lawyer-client material, it should be noted—that it mysteriously obtained, and ordered the return all the physical copies to O’Keefe and the destruction of any and all electronic copies it may have...
... Just how the Times got the material the Times, of course, won’t say—so much for the public’s right to know. Most likely, it was leaked to the newspaper by the FBI, which conducted an intimidating November raid on Project Veritas, including on O’Keefe himself, during which he was reportedly handcuffed.But why was the FBI acting like the Bidens’ private Praetorian Guard in the first place? No one alleges that Ashley Biden’s diary was stolen, and even if it was, so what? A lost diary, even one belonging to yet another troubled Biden offspring, is not a federal case. And in any event, Project Veritas never published the contents of the diary. The FBI investigation was concerned with “how a diary stolen from President Biden’s daughter, Ashley, came to be publicly disclosed a week and a half before the 2020 presidential election.”...
... At the same time, it was acting as an agent of the Democrat-controlled U.S. government in collecting and publishing dirt on a rival and political opponent to smear and destroy him...A final irony is that Times holds freedom of the press to an absolute, Mosaic standard while at the same time attacking freedom of assembly and freedom of religion, not to mention the entire Second Amendment, and supporting imaginary “hate speech” laws that clearly abrogate freedom of the press itself. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/how-the-new-york-times-abuses-the-publics-right-to-know_4181215.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mb-2021-12-29&mktids=3021cf6f1a9af9fbb5ab6ba2eecf65ad&est=QXaEtcrS5KgLhoGZ32wgfpxcPStr2svgYCipvOBSWSVlKzuhRne0SX%2BPLRC0]
Is the media so corrupt that it will cover-up leftist sex abuse?
In 2017, The Catholic Monitor reported on the Hillary and Francis media sex abuse cover-ups:
Francis, Hillary Clinton and the Media liken Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.
However, the evidence shows that Francis, Hillary and the Media have a
much better chance of winning a look-alike contest for resembling Hitler
than Trump.
They resemble him in one of his most distinguishing traits as a sex-abusing pedophile pervert.
Fatvox.com reports that two studies "commissioned by the U.S. government
during WWII" and a psychological analysis of Hitler said he was a
"pedophile" and a "corprophile" (a person who gets perverted sexual
pleasure from human feces).
GayDemon.com's gay dictionary says the homosexual street term for
corprophilia is "scat." The homosexual dictionary defines it as:
"Sexual play involving human feces, including ingestion as well as decorative."
Francis is not a corprophile like the Nazi tyrant. But, he appears
to have a fixation on corprophilia since he has twice publicly spoken of
this perversion which is rarely spoken of except in exceptionally
perverted homosexual websites.
This papal knowledge of the rare perversion of Hitler, which appears on
extremely depraved homosexual websites, is understandable since
according to Vatican expert Sandro Magister there are a sizable "number
of homosexual priests in the circle of his closest collaborators and
confidants."
Francis, while a not a pedophile, has protected priests who like Hitler
are pedophiles. He is widely known to cover up for and even reinstated
back into the priesthood known pedophile sex abusers.
Allegedly sexually abused Juanita Broaddrick who credibly accused Bill
Clinton of raping her said Trump apologized. Where is Hillary's apology?
She said of Hillary's cover up of Bill's alleged rape of her. It should
be added:
Where is the Media's apology for covering up for Clinton's alleged, but
credible rape of Broaddrick (especially considering their bringing
forward non-credible accusers against Trump of charges not as serious as
rape)?
In the footsteps of the Nazi Media, Hillary, Francis and the Media will
cover up for sex abuser who they think are fellow ideological comrades
and attack anyone whom they think opposes their ideological agenda.
On October 14, Newt Gingrich said that on that day another media accuser of Trump was proven to be a liar.
Why was the Media so fast to bring forward proven liars to accuse Trump?
Doesn't it seem that the Media tactics resembles the Nazi Media tactics
of falsely accusing Nazi opponents and covering up Nazi scandals?
Why has the Media been covering up against credible accusers of the Clintons and Francis?
The National Catholic Reporter, the respected journalist Michael Brendan
Dougherty and child advocate attorney Elizabeth Yore have provided
solid evidence that Francis covered up for pedophile sex abusers and
even reinstated to the priesthood a known pedophile, Mauro Inzoli.
Why is the Media covering up Francis's pedophile sex abuse cover up scandals? [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2017/02/why-is-media-covering-up-pope-franciss.html]
In 2016, The Catholic Monitor was already in a post asking "Are the Total Corruption of Hillary and the Media as well as their Cover-ups almost Satanic?":
All Catholics should be deeply disturbed by Wikileaks exposure of Hillary
Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta and his brother Tony being
linked to spiritual cooking which according to Churchmilitant.com is a
satanic ritual.
All Americans should be equally distrubed by the corruption and cover-ups of Clinton and the media.
Willey: "Whether he completed the act he originally had in mind isn't the primary thing. Violation takes many forms, and he committed that crime against me."
-Intimidated witnesses
-“[W]oman after woman has been demonized by their [the Clinton’s] secret police” according to Dick Morris
-Threatened your children
-Threatened your friend’s children
-Took one of your cats and killed another
-Left an animal skull on your porch
-Said you were in danger
-Followed you
-Put numerous nails in your car wheels
-Hid under your deck in the middle of the night
-Did a Watergate-like break-in into your house in 2007 and took a manuscript of your book “Target”
If Hillary is elected President, do you think she is capable of even doing worst things?
Willey: "Absolutely. There will be no stopping her then."
"'[The]New York Time' political reporter Mark Leibovich appears to have given Hillary Clinton's spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri editorial control over a major news story in 'The Times.' Reporter asked Miss Palmieri if he could use certain quotes that Hillary Clinton gave him in a private off the record meeting. That's against journalistic procedure. You don't write a political article okayed by a campaign. Another example, working for CNN at the time, now Democratic Chairwoman Donna Brazile apparently fed the Clinton campaign a question that CNN was going to ask doing a town hall meeting featuring Mrs. Clinton.
Again, that's corruption and that should never happen."
Newt Gingrich, on Hannity on October 14, said the Wikileaks leaks reveals "how sick, how dishonest and how corrupt" the media is and how it is "desperately propping up the most corrupt candidate in history" as well as will "reach for anything" to help make Hillary president. Gingrich said that on that very day a media accuser of Trump was proven to be a liar.
As reported in 2008, the national media attacked Cain for one woman
accusing him of inappropriate sexual behavior. But, at the exact same
time the national media ignored two male student editors accusation of
inappropriate sexual behavior by Obama as reported by the Kansas Citian:
"During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review
in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to
colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior
by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple
sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN." [http://thekansascitian.blogspot.com/2011/11/barack-obama-accused-by-two-men-of.html , http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2012/03/media-cover-up-of-obamas-inappropriate.html?m=1]
This total pattern of behavior by the media and Hillary Clinton is not just a cover-up. It is corruption.
I'll end this article with one last part of the interview where Willey
said she wished "I could exorcise the Clintons from my life."
Q: David Schipper, chief investigative counsel for the House Judiciary
Committee, recalled a priest came to see him after the impeachment who
said he was an exorcist.
The priest said to him “There are satanic influences in the White House, and they all want you out of here.”
“Yes, Bill Clinton is a bad guy,” Schipper acknowledged.
“No, not him,” the priest said. “Her.”
Schipper in your book said he thinks Hillary “is evil.” What do you think?
Willey: "I can't disagree with that analysis. If I could exorcise the Clintons from my life, I'd be happy to do so."
* As a last note in the previous post on the Catholic Monitor which was
the first draft of this article there is weird image of blogger text
covering the piece. This inexplicable blocking at the end of the post
only appears on the web version of the post, but is not present in the
blogger posting viewing or editing template. A friend of mine said
laughingly that someone down there didn't like the article.
Second note: About a week later the blockage was taken off so the end of the article can now be read. [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2016/10/are-hillary-and-media-cover-ups-of-bill.html?m=1] [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2016/10/are-total-corruption-of-hillary-and.html]