Are Francis Trads like 1P5 Sammons in SCHISM from ALL Valid Popes in History "to embrace a Moral Relativism under the Guise of a False 'Unity'"?
What is a Francis Traditionalist (Trad)?A Francis Trad is someone like One Peter Five Eric Sammons and other collaborators of his who do "handwringing" about Francis's "many heresies, idolatries, blasphemies, and marxism," but do nothing and call those Catholics like Bishop Rene Gracida and others who are doing something "schismatics." [See: Are Sammons' 1P5 and Lewis' Where Peter Is going to Merge and become Where One Peter Five Is?]
Here is Bishops Gracida's answer to them:
Bishop Gracida: "ONE CAN SAY THAT [MASS DESTROYER] FRANCIS IS A HERETIC UNTIL ONE DIES BUT IT CHANGES NOTHING. WHAT IS NEEDED IS ACTION... WE MUST PRESSURE THE CARDINALS [& BISHOPS] TO ACT" [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/bishop-gracida-one-can-say-that-mass.html]
Francis Trads appear to think that it is an infallible dogma that Francis is a
valid pope no matter what the evidence shows and moreover they must stay
in communion with him even when by his "authentic Magisterium"
authority he teaches Communion for adulterers without committing
They must never forget that they are in union with Francis and believe that he cannot be corrected for heresy nor can he as Doctor of the
Church St. Francis de Sales proclaimed be "deprived... of his Apostolic
See" for being "explicitly a heretic":
"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either
deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Today, the Les Femmes website put it well on the direction the Francis Trads want to take us:
Logically, either Pope Francis is wrong or Pope Benedict is wrong... Holy Tradition and past documents by popes like Pius V's Quo Primum (1570), an Apostolic Constitution promulgating the Tridentine Liturgy, make it clear that what is happening today is an aberration and a violent break from the past. [Side note: Quo Primum is a brief, totally transparent document unlike the wordy and endless blather put out by Pope Francis about the environment and ecumenism. READ THE APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION and keep in mind that an Apostolic Constitution is the most authoritative type of Vatican document! (source)]
To accept the thought of Pope Francis requires one to throw out two millennia of Church teaching in order to embrace a moral relativism under the guise of a false "unity." [https://lesfemmes-thetruth.blogspot.com/2021/12/got-logic-part-1-two-things-that-are.html]
Francis's means to "throw out two
millennia of Church teaching" is praxis theology.
Internationally renowned theologian Dr. Tracey Rowland said Francis's "decision - making process" outlined in Evangelii Gaudium is "the tendency to give priority to praxis over theory [the infallible doctrines of the Catholic Church]."
She states that chapter eight of Amoris Laetitia "might be described as the praxis chapter rather than a theory chapter." Theory meaning Catholic doctrine.
The renowned theologian asks:
How can footnote 351 of Amoris Laetitia "be consistent with paragraph eighty-four of John Paul II's Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris consortio and paragraph twenty-nine of Benedict XVI's Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis? A pastoral crisis may arise if the lay faithful and their priests have to choose between... two Popes (John Paul II and Benedict XVI) on one side, and a third Pope (Pope Francis) on the other." ("Catholic Theology," Page 192, 198, 199) [See:
The choice appears to be between the infallible doctrines of the Catholic Church or Francis's praxis theology.
However, all the Francis Traditionalists who the renowned Vatican expert Marco Tosatti's website describes as "the traditionalist-sedevacantists who do not want to understand nor even discuss the investigation of ... Bergoglio [Francis]" as they are all screaming at the top of their lungs that Francis is making "illegal laws" and may be a heretic for his most recent attack on the Traditional Latin Mass, but do nothing and call those Catholics like Bishop Gracida as well others who are doing something "schismatics." .
On December 15, in the Tosatti website, in the post "La Sede Impedita, Benedetto XVI, Bertone e Gänswein. Le Dimissioni" (which was translated by From Rome), he seemed to be a bit hard on the Francis Trads calling them "traditionalist-sedevacantists" because I assume they make a lot of noise, but don't act to solve the problems in the Church:
Now, the fact is that if we go to the next conclave with 80 non-cardinals appointed by the antipope, another antipope will be elected. Thus, if we continue to pay attention, on the one hand, to the mainstream that has sold out in block to Bergoglianism, and, on the other hand, to the traditionalist-sedevacantists who do not want to understand nor even discuss the investigation of Plan B and legitimize Bergoglio with canonical follies and, in addition, throw mud on the hated Ratzinger, then before resolving the matter we will have to endure another round of jousting with an antipope Tagle, or Zuppi, or Maradiaga, who will have the name John XXIV...
... The upper levels of the clergy, even if they have understood this, have been totally immobilized due to the possible retaliation of the antipope. The only ones who are able to do anything are journalists, but 98% of these are completely sold out to Bergoglianism, and the remaining 2% is held hostage by the anti-Ratzingerian traditionalists, and both categories together prevent there being any debate on this matter. [https://www.fromrome.info/2021/12/16/tosatti-airs-cioncis-impeded-see/]
With the possibility of a new conclave coming soon, in what way do the Francis Trads not act to solve the problem of Francis.
Again, Bishop Gracida said:
"ONE CAN SAY THAT FRANCIS THE MERCIFUL IS A HERETIC UNTIL ONE DIES BUT IT CHANGES NOTHING. WHAT IS NEEDED IS ACTION... WE MUST PRESSURE THE CARDINALS [& BISHOPS] TO ACT."
1. A validly elected pope who is a material heretic until cardinals correct him and then canonically proclaim he is a formal heretic if he doesn't recant thus deposing him (See: "Unambiguously Pope Francis Materially Professes Death Penalty Heresy: Cd. Burke: 'If a Pope would Formally Profess Heresy he would Cease, by that Act, to be the Pope'": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2018/08/unambiguously-pope-francis-materially.html?m=1) or
2. an invalidly elected antipope who is a heretic.
The point is whether you think using all the information available 1. is the objective truth or 2. is the objective truth you must act.
You must as Bishop Garcida says put: "pressure on the cardinals [and bishops] to act" whichever you think.
Remember when Francis and his Trad collaborators cry "SCHISM" at us it means they are AFRAID!
What are they afraid of?
They are AFRAID that it will finally get through the cowardly and apparently not too bright heads of the few faithful bishops and cardinals that:
Zero valid popes in the history of the Catholic Church have committed the sacrilege of instituting as the Vatican's official teaching that unrepentant adulterous couples can profane the Holy of Holy Jesus Christ who is true God by having unrepentant sinners receive Him in the Most Holy Eucharist.
Nor have any of ALL the valid popes in history even come close to ambiguously teaching such a blasphemy which could be taken in either a orthodox or heretical way (for all the conservative and traditionalist Francis apologists).
Next to this sacrilege against the Most Holy Eucharist, the attempted proposed Amazonian Synod heresy of women's ordination was a minor sacrilege.
Maybe these cowardly and apparently not too bright bishops and cardinals might, finally, realize:
Francis is in SCHISM from ALL valid popes in the history of the Catholic Church.
Are Francis Trads like 1P5 Sammons in SCHISM from ALL valid popes in history "to embrace a moral relativism under the guise of a false 'unity'"?
Or, maybe they will, finally, join Bishop Gracida and call for an investigation on if
the Francis conclave was invalid which even Cardinal Raymond Burke says
is a valid possibly.
Or, maybe because it is their infallible belief that there can never be a invalid pope or antipope then they will do what Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said:
"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?
Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.