Skip to main content

The 2000 Presidential Election in Florida threw out "over 57,000 [Illegal] Voters... Identified as Felons," in 2020 it may possibly be Millions of Illegal Voters Thrown Out

Today, President Donald Trump "challenge[d] Joe [Biden] and every Democrat to clarify that they only want legal votes. We want every legal vote counted. We want openness and transparency. No secret count rooms, no mystery ballots, no illegal votes being cast after election day.” 

Moreover, he said that there would "be a lot of litigation" which may end up going all the way to the Supreme Court:

“We think there’s going to be a lot of litigation. We have so much evidence, so much proof. It’s going to end up perhaps at the highest court in the land.”

“We can’t have an election stolen like this. We can’t let that happen to the United States of America. It’s not a question of who wins, Republican or Democrat, Joe, myself. We can’t be disgraced by letting something like this happen.” [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trump-theyre-trying-to-steal-an-election-and-we-cant-let-that-happen]

One time that something like this happens was with the 2000 presidential election recount in Florida. One of the issues in the 2000 recount as in this one was illegal voters casting votes in the election according to Wikipedia:

"Between May 1999 and Election Day 2000, two Florida secretaries of state, Sandra Mortham and Katherine Harris, contracted with DBT Online Inc., at a cost of $4.294 million, to have the "scrub lists" reworked. In a May 2000 list, over 57,000 voters were identified as felons, with all counties being ordered to remove all listed names from their voting rolls. Democrats claimed that many simply had names similar to actual felons, some listed "felonies" were dated years in the future, and some were random. Some counties refused to use the list, finding it error-ridden. In other counties, supervisors of elections notified those at risk of being scrubbed, giving them a chance to prove they were not felons, which a small number chose to do. In most cases, those on the scrub list were not told that they weren't allowed to vote until they were turned away at the polls. An estimated 15% of the names on the county lists were in error" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida]

In 2000, "over 57,000 voters were identified as felons, with all counties being ordered to remove all listed names from their voting rolls." Non-registered voters, illegal aliens, felons and others are not allowed to vote so possibly hundreds of thousands to millions of the Biden votes must be ordered to be removed.

There is abundant evidence that possibly hundreds of thousands to millions of the Biden votes and voters were illegal as the Washington Times reported:

The Washington Times reported that "352 U.S. counties in 29 states managed to have 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens." [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/20/judicial-watch-finds-18-million-ghost-voters-in-29/]

- The  Geller Report reported that "Wisconsin['s]... Total number of registered voters: 3,129,000. Total number of votes cast: 3,239,920... [this is] evidence of fraud." [https://gellerreport.com/2020/11/fraud-wisconsin-has-more-votes-than-people-registered-to-vote.html/]

- Attorney Robert Barnes showed evidence of 100 thousand Wisconsin "overvotes for Biden": 

Same oddity of 100K overvotes for Biden in a swing state, as if 100k people only marked their ballot for Biden, which is another statistical anomaly. [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]
[retweeted:]
wyatt@wyattsheepie

Quick math here need to double check: Wisconsin GOP house candidate votes 1,620,435. Trump 1,610,001 Dem house candidate votes 1,525,836 Biden 1,630,535[https://twitter.com/wyattsheepie/status/1324397766685110279] 
 
Project Veritas reported "a groundbreaking undercover report Wednesday night where a Michigan USPS whistleblower claims superiors instructed employees to back-date mail-in-ballots coming in after November 3rd." [https://abyssum.org/2020/11/05/fraud-your-name-is-democrat/]
 
Constitutional lawyer Barnes put it best:   
 
"Just a reminder: just last year, Democrats demanded, and received, a new election for federal office when just a small amount of fraud was found." [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]
 
"Did signatures match voter registration file? How did they confirm? Is that why they removed observers? What about the chain of custody of the ballots? How did dead people[, non-registered voters, illegal aliens, felons and others] manage to vote? This is way beyond Trump; this is about faith & confidence in our Constitutional democracy." [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary

 

Comments

Ivanmijeime said…
Worker describes how a Ferrari & Van showed up with the 130,000 ballots that were 100% for Biden at 4am on Nov 4th.

https://gloria.tv/post/MNzBiFgjj11Z1cZdcvVQ3sPBY

Ivan

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...