Skip to main content

Historian Dr. Mazza: "There is No Next Time. There Won't be a Free Election, Again... [if we] Fail to Pray, if we fail... to go into the Streets... to Save the Republic"

Historian Dr. Edmund Mazza, former Full Professor at Azusa Pacific University, is the author of the book "The Scholastics and the Jews." [https://www.edmundmazza.com/author/edmundmazza/]

The historian Mazza in the YouTube show "The Meaning of Catholic" stated the 2020 presidential election process followed the classic historical tactics of a "coup" or "hostile takeover" of a country by leftists who subvert the the constitutional democratic process by massive media disinformation and full scale fraud in the voting process.

The historian in the show said ""There is no next time. There won't be a free election, again... [if we] fail to pray, if we fail to protest and if necessary we fail to go into the streets and try to save the republic, if we fail to do that we will take that failure to our grave":

This is not just another election. Where our guy lost and we say well we'll get them next time. There is no next time. There won't be a free election, again."

"They can camouflage and sabotage worst than this one. There is no tomorrow!"

"And if we as Catholic American citizens fail to pray, if we fail to protest and if necessary we fail to go into the streets and try to save the republic, if we fail to do that we will take that failure to our grave!" ("Against Hostile Takeover with Dr. Edmund Mazza" on YouTube,  37:56-38:31: https://youtu.be/m5s3XpQsnS8)  

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more