Skip to main content

The 2000 Presidential Election in Florida threw out "over 57,000 [Illegal] Voters... Identified as Felons," in 2020 it may possibly be Millions of Illegal Voters Thrown Out

Today, President Donald Trump "challenge[d] Joe [Biden] and every Democrat to clarify that they only want legal votes. We want every legal vote counted. We want openness and transparency. No secret count rooms, no mystery ballots, no illegal votes being cast after election day.” 

Moreover, he said that there would "be a lot of litigation" which may end up going all the way to the Supreme Court:

“We think there’s going to be a lot of litigation. We have so much evidence, so much proof. It’s going to end up perhaps at the highest court in the land.”

“We can’t have an election stolen like this. We can’t let that happen to the United States of America. It’s not a question of who wins, Republican or Democrat, Joe, myself. We can’t be disgraced by letting something like this happen.” [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trump-theyre-trying-to-steal-an-election-and-we-cant-let-that-happen]

One time that something like this happens was with the 2000 presidential election recount in Florida. One of the issues in the 2000 recount as in this one was illegal voters casting votes in the election according to Wikipedia:

"Between May 1999 and Election Day 2000, two Florida secretaries of state, Sandra Mortham and Katherine Harris, contracted with DBT Online Inc., at a cost of $4.294 million, to have the "scrub lists" reworked. In a May 2000 list, over 57,000 voters were identified as felons, with all counties being ordered to remove all listed names from their voting rolls. Democrats claimed that many simply had names similar to actual felons, some listed "felonies" were dated years in the future, and some were random. Some counties refused to use the list, finding it error-ridden. In other counties, supervisors of elections notified those at risk of being scrubbed, giving them a chance to prove they were not felons, which a small number chose to do. In most cases, those on the scrub list were not told that they weren't allowed to vote until they were turned away at the polls. An estimated 15% of the names on the county lists were in error" [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida]

In 2000, "over 57,000 voters were identified as felons, with all counties being ordered to remove all listed names from their voting rolls." Non-registered voters, illegal aliens, felons and others are not allowed to vote so possibly hundreds of thousands to millions of the Biden votes must be ordered to be removed.

There is abundant evidence that possibly hundreds of thousands to millions of the Biden votes and voters were illegal as the Washington Times reported:

The Washington Times reported that "352 U.S. counties in 29 states managed to have 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens." [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/20/judicial-watch-finds-18-million-ghost-voters-in-29/]

- The  Geller Report reported that "Wisconsin['s]... Total number of registered voters: 3,129,000. Total number of votes cast: 3,239,920... [this is] evidence of fraud." [https://gellerreport.com/2020/11/fraud-wisconsin-has-more-votes-than-people-registered-to-vote.html/]

- Attorney Robert Barnes showed evidence of 100 thousand Wisconsin "overvotes for Biden": 

Same oddity of 100K overvotes for Biden in a swing state, as if 100k people only marked their ballot for Biden, which is another statistical anomaly. [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]
[retweeted:]
wyatt@wyattsheepie

Quick math here need to double check: Wisconsin GOP house candidate votes 1,620,435. Trump 1,610,001 Dem house candidate votes 1,525,836 Biden 1,630,535[https://twitter.com/wyattsheepie/status/1324397766685110279] 
 
Project Veritas reported "a groundbreaking undercover report Wednesday night where a Michigan USPS whistleblower claims superiors instructed employees to back-date mail-in-ballots coming in after November 3rd." [https://abyssum.org/2020/11/05/fraud-your-name-is-democrat/]
 
Constitutional lawyer Barnes put it best:   
 
"Just a reminder: just last year, Democrats demanded, and received, a new election for federal office when just a small amount of fraud was found." [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]
 
"Did signatures match voter registration file? How did they confirm? Is that why they removed observers? What about the chain of custody of the ballots? How did dead people[, non-registered voters, illegal aliens, felons and others] manage to vote? This is way beyond Trump; this is about faith & confidence in our Constitutional democracy." [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary

 

Comments

Unknown said…
Worker describes how a Ferrari & Van showed up with the 130,000 ballots that were 100% for Biden at 4am on Nov 4th.

https://gloria.tv/post/MNzBiFgjj11Z1cZdcvVQ3sPBY

Ivan

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul