Skip to main content

Why & How are Twitter and Facebook "Risking Public Notice of their Brazen [Political] Censorship" of Biden Scandal?

Premiere lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported why Facebook and Twitter "are risking public notice of their brazen censorship" of the @NYPost article about the Hunter Biden and Joe Biden political scandal:

"Twitter, Facebook, and Google have the real election data, from their internal algorithmic information. They are risking public notice of their brazen censorship to suppress the Biden story to the extent of blocking the White House. What does that tell you about how close it is?.. " 

"...  BREAKING: Twitter has locked the White House Press Secretary's Twitter account.[https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]

A Blog for Dallas Area Catholic nicely summarized why and how Twitter and Facebook can "risk... public notice of their brazen censorship." The "entire deep state corruptocrat apparatus" including "turncoat Republican leaders" are covering up for them:

"[T]he entire deep state corruptocrat apparatus in and out of government running cover for Biden, to an even greater degree than they did for Hillary in 2016, to see Trump through to re-election is up in the air, and also up to us.  Vote early and at least as often as your demonrat neighbors.  But more importantly, pray, pray for our nation, our Church, and our president, that the most reliably conservative and, frankly, Christian (in his policy) president this nation has seen in a century or so may be re-elected, and his enemies – who haven’t tried to hide in the slightest that they most definitely seem themselves as our enemies – may be vanquished, exposed, and driven from their seats of power."

"And after that re-election, may there also be a reckoning for those corrupt, turncoat Republican leaders in the House and Senate, like Jim Jordan and Mitch McConnell, who have aided and abetted the monopolist social meda congolmerates in their efforts to shut down the rights of free men and women while protecting the interests of a narrow, incompetent, and most inaptly named elite.  These traitors have helped push this nation to the brink of civil war and caused untold misery by their constant support for their corporate donor overlords.  I’ve had more than enough of it.  And no self-interested video from Ben Shapiro, apologizing for the corporate oligarchy, is going to change my mind." [https://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2020/10/15/doing-my-part-to-thwart-the-leftist-attempt-to-memory-hole-evidence-of-biden-democrat-corruption-and-bribe-taking/]

Legal and political analyst for Fox News Channel Gregg Jarrett shows the exact lying double standard of the "corruptocrat" propaganda "apparatus":

"Let me get this straight: The NY Times can post to Twitter & Facebook its story on Trump’s taxes based on unnamed sources and documents it won’t produce. But the NY Post cannot post its story on Biden based on documents it produced. Confused? Don’t be. It’s political censorship." [https://twitter.com/GreggJarrett]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

The Bear said…
At least watch the trailer for the new Netflix social media documentary. (Don’t have Netflix, but the trailer is disturbing enough.) I’ll say it again: we’re using what is for all intents and purposes alien technology. The internet is changing the way we process information in ways far too few people want to think about. But when we tell corporations everything there is to know about us and are surprised when that information is abused, or when politics impact what we spend half our waking life with—well, a Bear would not be surprised if it all goes very wrong.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk