Skip to main content

Why & How are Twitter and Facebook "Risking Public Notice of their Brazen [Political] Censorship" of Biden Scandal?

Premiere lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported why Facebook and Twitter "are risking public notice of their brazen censorship" of the @NYPost article about the Hunter Biden and Joe Biden political scandal:

"Twitter, Facebook, and Google have the real election data, from their internal algorithmic information. They are risking public notice of their brazen censorship to suppress the Biden story to the extent of blocking the White House. What does that tell you about how close it is?.. " 

"...  BREAKING: Twitter has locked the White House Press Secretary's Twitter account.[https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]

A Blog for Dallas Area Catholic nicely summarized why and how Twitter and Facebook can "risk... public notice of their brazen censorship." The "entire deep state corruptocrat apparatus" including "turncoat Republican leaders" are covering up for them:

"[T]he entire deep state corruptocrat apparatus in and out of government running cover for Biden, to an even greater degree than they did for Hillary in 2016, to see Trump through to re-election is up in the air, and also up to us.  Vote early and at least as often as your demonrat neighbors.  But more importantly, pray, pray for our nation, our Church, and our president, that the most reliably conservative and, frankly, Christian (in his policy) president this nation has seen in a century or so may be re-elected, and his enemies – who haven’t tried to hide in the slightest that they most definitely seem themselves as our enemies – may be vanquished, exposed, and driven from their seats of power."

"And after that re-election, may there also be a reckoning for those corrupt, turncoat Republican leaders in the House and Senate, like Jim Jordan and Mitch McConnell, who have aided and abetted the monopolist social meda congolmerates in their efforts to shut down the rights of free men and women while protecting the interests of a narrow, incompetent, and most inaptly named elite.  These traitors have helped push this nation to the brink of civil war and caused untold misery by their constant support for their corporate donor overlords.  I’ve had more than enough of it.  And no self-interested video from Ben Shapiro, apologizing for the corporate oligarchy, is going to change my mind." [https://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2020/10/15/doing-my-part-to-thwart-the-leftist-attempt-to-memory-hole-evidence-of-biden-democrat-corruption-and-bribe-taking/]

Legal and political analyst for Fox News Channel Gregg Jarrett shows the exact lying double standard of the "corruptocrat" propaganda "apparatus":

"Let me get this straight: The NY Times can post to Twitter & Facebook its story on Trump’s taxes based on unnamed sources and documents it won’t produce. But the NY Post cannot post its story on Biden based on documents it produced. Confused? Don’t be. It’s political censorship." [https://twitter.com/GreggJarrett]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

The Bear said…
At least watch the trailer for the new Netflix social media documentary. (Don’t have Netflix, but the trailer is disturbing enough.) I’ll say it again: we’re using what is for all intents and purposes alien technology. The internet is changing the way we process information in ways far too few people want to think about. But when we tell corporations everything there is to know about us and are surprised when that information is abused, or when politics impact what we spend half our waking life with—well, a Bear would not be surprised if it all goes very wrong.
11:48 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more