Skip to main content

Science on Mask's Possible Effects: "Can Damage the Lungs... can even be Life Threatening" & "Mental Confusion... Loss of Consciousness and Death"

The coronavirus overwhelmingly kills elderly people.

It appears that the coronavirus mask might have a better chance of killing a non-elderly person than COVID-19:

"COVID-19... N95 masks are estimated to reduce oxygen intake by anywhere from 5 to 20 percent. That’s significant, even for a healthy person. It can cause dizziness and lightheadedness. If you wear a mask long enough, it can damage the lungs. For a patient in respiratory distress, it can even be life threatening." [https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/14/stanford-researchers-reengineer-covid-19-face-masks/]

"Because there are no warning signs of reduced oxygen concentrations, these environments are extremely dangerous. Effects of exposure to low oxygen concentrations can include giddiness, mental confusion, loss of judgment, loss of coordination, weakness, nausea, fainting, loss of consciousness and death"
[https://www.airproducts.com › Files › PDF › company › safetygram-17]

Is science saying that you have a greater chance of death and  "mental confusion" because of the mask than of COVID?

Is the mask causing "mental confusion"?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the 

Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph 
of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and 
the Immaculate Heart of Mary

 

Comments

Unknown said…
"It appears that the coronavirus mask might have a better chance of killing a non-elderly person than COVID-19:"

I am saying exactly that for the months, since the beginning of the plandemic.
And I am not even a doctor nor scientist.

Ivan
Anonymous said…
So if this is true, then all surgeons and surgery staff would have damaged their lungs long ago. Some of the surgeries last an entire day. The mask thing is nuts on all sides of this issue. Good Lord, we have more serious issues to worry about.
Fred Martinez said…
First, since you are a COVID eternal mask wearing Karen, please answer this question:

Shouldn’t these masks be considered “toxic waste” - especially as they are supposedly trapping a virus so deadly we need bogus test to know we have it. Surely even muzzle wearers can see the blatant inconsistency here? Or is that simply too much to hope for?

Next, so "[i]f you wear a mask long enough" said the piece.

If "surgeons and surgery staff" like many female and male COVID hysteria Karens were to wear their masks all day long or most of the day and for months on end might they "damage their lungs" especially if they had other medical issues?

Think about it:

In the history of "all surgeons and surgery staff" mask wearing did they wear their masks all day long or most of the day and for months on end and maybe forever if your beloved pro-abortion Biden is elected.
Fred Martinez said…
Yes, promoters of the sacred "pro-life" and eternal mask are helping to promote the election of pro-abortion Biden.
Anonymous said…
Fred, remember, we will all answer for every word we utter. If you call people idiots or Karens, you must answer to the Lord. And Karen is being used in a derogatory manner by you. I too would like to t-off on people, and I have. But we need keep Christ's words in mind. Never said one must wear one 24/7. Don't know where that is required or mandated by anyone. I don't think anyone can say with absolute certainty that masks will help or not. So those who are against them may be wrong, and those who for them may be wrong. I do know, but masks have been used for a long, long time in the medical field, worn by people appear to be healthy, doctors and nurses. And they have also been used by the sick in the past. It was never an issue until now. Oh, by the way, I hate the mask. The only thing I seek is the truth. Not your truth, not my truth, but the truth. Some times the truth is not always apparent. I voted for Trump. Voted for Reagan twice. I am no liberal. My dad was a WWII combat vet in S. Pacific.
Karen means someone who complains. You were complaining about my post. I answered your complaining comment and you accussed me of calling you a "idiot" when I used a word that means you were complaining.

Please identify who you really are if you want to keep commenting on the Catholic Monitor.

If you are a Trump supporter, I apologise for saying Biden is beloved by you. I agree objective truth is what is important. I will pray for you. Please, pray for me
Unknown said…
Oh, Good Lord, no I do not support Joe. Glory be! I find communication to be difficult in these formats Fred. So much misunderstood. Poorly expressed by me. It would be far superior to do chew the fat over a brew! I will pray for you from the Heart of the Country.
Fred Martinez said…
Unknown, thank you for your prayers "from the Heart of the Country." I am praying for you from California.

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul