Skip to main content

Science on Mask's Possible Effects: "Can Damage the Lungs... can even be Life Threatening" & "Mental Confusion... Loss of Consciousness and Death"

The coronavirus overwhelmingly kills elderly people.

It appears that the coronavirus mask might have a better chance of killing a non-elderly person than COVID-19:

"COVID-19... N95 masks are estimated to reduce oxygen intake by anywhere from 5 to 20 percent. That’s significant, even for a healthy person. It can cause dizziness and lightheadedness. If you wear a mask long enough, it can damage the lungs. For a patient in respiratory distress, it can even be life threatening." [https://news.stanford.edu/2020/04/14/stanford-researchers-reengineer-covid-19-face-masks/]

"Because there are no warning signs of reduced oxygen concentrations, these environments are extremely dangerous. Effects of exposure to low oxygen concentrations can include giddiness, mental confusion, loss of judgment, loss of coordination, weakness, nausea, fainting, loss of consciousness and death"
[https://www.airproducts.com › Files › PDF › company › safetygram-17]

Is science saying that you have a greater chance of death and  "mental confusion" because of the mask than of COVID?

Is the mask causing "mental confusion"?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the 

Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph 
of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and 
the Immaculate Heart of Mary

 

Comments

Ivanmijeime said…
"It appears that the coronavirus mask might have a better chance of killing a non-elderly person than COVID-19:"

I am saying exactly that for the months, since the beginning of the plandemic.
And I am not even a doctor nor scientist.

Ivan
Anonymous said…
So if this is true, then all surgeons and surgery staff would have damaged their lungs long ago. Some of the surgeries last an entire day. The mask thing is nuts on all sides of this issue. Good Lord, we have more serious issues to worry about.
Fred Martinez said…
First, since you are a COVID eternal mask wearing Karen, please answer this question:

Shouldn’t these masks be considered “toxic waste” - especially as they are supposedly trapping a virus so deadly we need bogus test to know we have it. Surely even muzzle wearers can see the blatant inconsistency here? Or is that simply too much to hope for?

Next, so "[i]f you wear a mask long enough" said the piece.

If "surgeons and surgery staff" like many female and male COVID hysteria Karens were to wear their masks all day long or most of the day and for months on end might they "damage their lungs" especially if they had other medical issues?

Think about it:

In the history of "all surgeons and surgery staff" mask wearing did they wear their masks all day long or most of the day and for months on end and maybe forever if your beloved pro-abortion Biden is elected.
Fred Martinez said…
Yes, promoters of the sacred "pro-life" and eternal mask are helping to promote the election of pro-abortion Biden.
Anonymous said…
Fred, remember, we will all answer for every word we utter. If you call people idiots or Karens, you must answer to the Lord. And Karen is being used in a derogatory manner by you. I too would like to t-off on people, and I have. But we need keep Christ's words in mind. Never said one must wear one 24/7. Don't know where that is required or mandated by anyone. I don't think anyone can say with absolute certainty that masks will help or not. So those who are against them may be wrong, and those who for them may be wrong. I do know, but masks have been used for a long, long time in the medical field, worn by people appear to be healthy, doctors and nurses. And they have also been used by the sick in the past. It was never an issue until now. Oh, by the way, I hate the mask. The only thing I seek is the truth. Not your truth, not my truth, but the truth. Some times the truth is not always apparent. I voted for Trump. Voted for Reagan twice. I am no liberal. My dad was a WWII combat vet in S. Pacific.
Karen means someone who complains. You were complaining about my post. I answered your complaining comment and you accussed me of calling you a "idiot" when I used a word that means you were complaining.

Please identify who you really are if you want to keep commenting on the Catholic Monitor.

If you are a Trump supporter, I apologise for saying Biden is beloved by you. I agree objective truth is what is important. I will pray for you. Please, pray for me
Anonymous said…
Oh, Good Lord, no I do not support Joe. Glory be! I find communication to be difficult in these formats Fred. So much misunderstood. Poorly expressed by me. It would be far superior to do chew the fat over a brew! I will pray for you from the Heart of the Country.
Fred Martinez said…
Unknown, thank you for your prayers "from the Heart of the Country." I am praying for you from California.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...