Skip to main content

How many Virus Catholics does it take to Screw in a Light Bulb to see the Communion for Adulterers Heresy & COVID Hysteria are Hoaxes?

How many conservative and Francis traditionalist Catholics does it take take to screw a light bulb to see that the  Communion for adulterers heresy and the coronavirus hysteria are hoaxes?

Two: One to screw the light bulb to see Francis the Infallible and a second to say the Communion for adulterers heresy can't be corrected and the coronavirus is really, really the Black Plague because Francis says so and he is definitely the pope and maybe some future pope can correct the Communion for adulterers heresy and maybe tell us that the coronavirus wasn't the Black Plague and maybe that future pope will end the banning of the Mass.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
One of the hallmarks of the spirit of the Antichrist is the religious devotion modern men have to errors. In ages past, Catholics had no ideological presuppositions to consider the election of pontiffs or the lethality of disease a question open for discussion. Now as Chesterton warned, wars erupt as soon as a Catholic says grass is green or the sky is blue, because certain cliques say otherwise.

A prime example is Cardinal Burke. IN the recent RAI3 documentary he was shown to be eager to help a friend get a cushy job for his son in the Italian Government. But he has never shown even 1 drop of zeal to listen to the facts and evidence that Benedict is still the pope!

Reality is the enemy. Ideology is the religion of the present.

10:18 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more