Skip to main content

Maybe Voris should rename his Organization: Saint Romero's Media

Most Catholics don't know that Archbishop Oscar Romero is beloved by the so-called conservative Opus Dei (OD) which can be verified one a quick google of Oscar Romero and Opus Dei.

Crux reported that the archbishop was a disciple of OD according to Romero's former secretary Jesus Delgado who was "expelled from the priesthood" for "charges of sexual abuse."

Delgado, according to Crux, said:

"[T]he books on Opus Dei Romero owned were well-thumbed."
(Crux, "On Romero and Paul VI and their surprising affinity for Opus Dei," October 14, 2018)

Unlike Opus Dei, the Society of St. Puis X (SSPX) and apparently even conservative Catholics remained "uneasy about his connection with Liberation Theology... Some of Romero's fellow Latin American bishops even considered Archbishop Romero a 'cryto-Communist.'"
(SSPX.org, "Is Romero a martyr of the Faith," February 6, 2015)

Might the so-called conservative Opus Dei and conservative Catholic news outlets that collaborate with it be angry with SSPX because they wrote that some Latin American bishops thought Romero was a "crypto-Communist"?

One of Opus Dei's top conservative Catholic media promoters is pundit Michael Voris.

The organization that Gary Michael Voris founded is actually called Saint Michael's Media of which ChurchMilitant.com produces video programs for according to Wikipedia.

Maybe Voris should change the name of his organization to Saint Romero's Media since it apparently never investigated that Archbishop Romero's former secretary was a sex abuser.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk