Skip to main content

Viganò: Bergoglio saying ‘all religions are a path to God’ is apostasy Responding to Francis' statement..Viganò remarked that the 'ungodly' claim 'deceives' people 'into believing that it is possible to be saved without recognizing that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.'

Comments

Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
4:27 AM
Renato said…
St. Robert Berllarmine argues that an eventuality of a "heretical Pope" would not be possible. Thus a Supreme Pontiff could not be judged by anyone, that is, on the main reason, that the inferior cannot judge the superior.(https://stmichaels.org/doctrine-class/pdfs/19-05-14-St.-Robert-Bellarmine-Whether-a-Heretical-Pope-Can-Be-Deposed.pdf).

This means that only a Pope can judge another Pope, for example, the judgment of Pope Stephen VI on Pope Formosus, known as the Synod of the Corpse (year 897), but which was not focused on doctrinal issues, but on political ones (https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06139b.htm).

Then he argues that a Roman Pontiff would cease to be "ipso facto" the Supreme Pontificate, from which he himself deposes, to also cease to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Therefore, in this case, the Church would not be judging the Pope, but she would be removing from the Chair of St. Peter an impostor, a usurper, an antipope, because the office of the Pope, of the Supreme Pontiff, is precisely to defend the Catholic faith, and not to betray it.

And this argument fits perfectly with the person of Jorge Mario Bergoglio who utters continuous heresies.

And "Universi Dominici Gregis" becomes the objective solution to remove it from the Roman See; Benedict XVI did not abdicate the office (Munus petrino) to show that his direct successor, Bergoglio, an impostor, usurper and antipope, through articles 76 and 77.

These articles impel a deep understanding that it is up to us not so much to judge the person, but to discern such a fact for an attitude to be taken.

I once commented that there would be more confusion among Catholics soon. I suppose this: if I don't have this understanding of what Ratzinger did, then I would continue to be stuck in this probable legacy in this church of make-believe.

All this leads me to deduce that there will be an illegitimate conclave again.

5:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more