Viganò: Bergoglio saying ‘all religions are a path to God’ is apostasy Responding to Francis' statement..Viganò remarked that the 'ungodly' claim 'deceives' people 'into believing that it is possible to be saved without recognizing that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.'
Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio saying ‘all religions are a path to God’ is apostasy
Responding to Francis' statement that 'all religions' lead to God, Archbishop Viganò remarked that the 'ungodly' claim 'deceives' people 'into believing that it is possible to be saved without recognizing that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.'
Comments
This means that only a Pope can judge another Pope, for example, the judgment of Pope Stephen VI on Pope Formosus, known as the Synod of the Corpse (year 897), but which was not focused on doctrinal issues, but on political ones (https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06139b.htm).
Then he argues that a Roman Pontiff would cease to be "ipso facto" the Supreme Pontificate, from which he himself deposes, to also cease to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Therefore, in this case, the Church would not be judging the Pope, but she would be removing from the Chair of St. Peter an impostor, a usurper, an antipope, because the office of the Pope, of the Supreme Pontiff, is precisely to defend the Catholic faith, and not to betray it.
And this argument fits perfectly with the person of Jorge Mario Bergoglio who utters continuous heresies.
And "Universi Dominici Gregis" becomes the objective solution to remove it from the Roman See; Benedict XVI did not abdicate the office (Munus petrino) to show that his direct successor, Bergoglio, an impostor, usurper and antipope, through articles 76 and 77.
These articles impel a deep understanding that it is up to us not so much to judge the person, but to discern such a fact for an attitude to be taken.
I once commented that there would be more confusion among Catholics soon. I suppose this: if I don't have this understanding of what Ratzinger did, then I would continue to be stuck in this probable legacy in this church of make-believe.
All this leads me to deduce that there will be an illegitimate conclave again.