5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits
Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
Comments
Can you explain that to us, your excellency?
If the judgment is not about a Pope, then the election of the "Pope" was null and void from the beginning. For example, the candidate for Supreme Pontiff was a woman, or a demented, or an apostate, etc.
In Bergoglio's case, he is simply a false pope because Ratzinger has not abdicated the office. That is why he utters continual heresies to demonstrate that he does not have the assistance of the Holy Spirit.
It can be deduced from this article that the majority of cardinals and bishops know only that one cannot judge a Pope, as Berllarmine affirms that no one can judge him, because above a Roman Pontiff only God.
That is why Bergoglio can stay in Rome for more years.
It is also deduced that this bishop thus loses himself in the same way. Therefore, it is due to ignorance or negligence about this cause. The bishop lacks love for the truth.