https://canon212.com/: RemnantMag, whose editor didn’t sign the Rorate call for Francis to step down, makes latest attempt to lump destructive, disappointing VII era popes in with The Fraudulent Holiness, thus giving it backhanded credibility

RemnantMag, whose editor didn’t sign the Rorate call for Francis to step down, makes latest attempt to lump destructive, disappointing VII era popes in with The Fraudulent Holiness, thus giving it backhanded credibility

Comments

Renato said…

I think the problem that many don't realize is that both editors of these sites place an indirect legitimacy on this pontificate.

For instance:

If there is an indirect credibility on Matt's part now, then he indirectly demonstrates a legitimacy in Bergoglio before.

And if the other asks for a direct resignation, then he obviously says directly that there is also a legitimacy in Bergoglio.

But Articles 76 and 77 of the Universi Dominici Gregis reveal that this pontificate is not legitimate and has its acts null and void. Because the Constitution says that Pope Francis does not have the Petrine Munus, according to Canon 32.2; Therefore he cannot give up anything.

Because a person only renounces something when that same person has something to renounce.

Due to the lack of credibility of the popes and their laws, this fact becomes an aggravating factor that must be considered. This shows that it is a path that may have no turning back...

1:51 PM

Renato said…

Both editors of these sites place a legitimacy on this pontificate, not a legitimacy indirectly on both. An editor does this indirectly; another editor directly.

2:08 PM

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

Deliverance Prayers II The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever were immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest. I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

The Catholic Monitor

Search This Blog