Skip to main content

LifeSite News: Cardinal Fernández said Pope Francis has the ‘right’ to endorse homosexual ‘blessings’ in contradiction to Catholic teaching and that the matter is ‘close to the pope’s heart.’

Cardinal Fernández defends Fiducia Supplicans, says Pope Francis ‘has expanded our understanding’

Comments

Renato said…
Recently Gerhard Müller said in an interview that "the Pope does not have the authority to change the teaching of the Church, which is rooted in the revelation of God"; Bergoglio, however, was not warned about this...

The article shows a lot of clear evidence that the non-Catholic Pope Francis has changed a lot in his non-Catholic pontificate and will certainly change a lot more about God's revelation.


That should be obvious to many in these 10 years of pontificate since the null abdication of Benedict XVI, but it is not.

Less especially to these prelates, in the example of Müller with cardinalitial privileges; but the despised Universi Dominici Gregis says he is not a cardinal. And it would demonstrate the truth that the one who sits on the Chair of Peter today is Pope, but only if he is from a schismatic Church.

Many are still entangled in the Gnostic hypnosis of deception, for this is beyond the human capacity of discernment because it is diabolical. They are part of the Mystical Body of the Antichrist, for they do not have the grace to run away from it. It is a divine punishment for a contempt of the truth.

There are two verses in the same Bible passage that is in this context about all of this today. In it he says, "I know your works, I know that you are neither cold nor hot." And it goes on to say, "Because you are lukewarm, you are neither cold nor hot, I am about to vomit you out of my mouth (Revelation 3:15-16)."

I think now that one should let the dead bury the other dead (Matthew 8:22), for one should not go against that reality.

This is part of the continuing hope about divine providence in us, in the example of Benedict XVI, for a complete restoration in the Church soon.
8:47 PM
Renato said…
A small correction above: Bergoglio really is Pope, but from the schismatic Church of the Antichrist. In these times, out of conscience, we must strive to maintain consistency if we are to show any truth to others.
9:25 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more