Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
The article shows a lot of clear evidence that the non-Catholic Pope Francis has changed a lot in his non-Catholic pontificate and will certainly change a lot more about God's revelation.
That should be obvious to many in these 10 years of pontificate since the null abdication of Benedict XVI, but it is not.
Less especially to these prelates, in the example of Müller with cardinalitial privileges; but the despised Universi Dominici Gregis says he is not a cardinal. And it would demonstrate the truth that the one who sits on the Chair of Peter today is Pope, but only if he is from a schismatic Church.
Many are still entangled in the Gnostic hypnosis of deception, for this is beyond the human capacity of discernment because it is diabolical. They are part of the Mystical Body of the Antichrist, for they do not have the grace to run away from it. It is a divine punishment for a contempt of the truth.
There are two verses in the same Bible passage that is in this context about all of this today. In it he says, "I know your works, I know that you are neither cold nor hot." And it goes on to say, "Because you are lukewarm, you are neither cold nor hot, I am about to vomit you out of my mouth (Revelation 3:15-16)."
I think now that one should let the dead bury the other dead (Matthew 8:22), for one should not go against that reality.
This is part of the continuing hope about divine providence in us, in the example of Benedict XVI, for a complete restoration in the Church soon.