10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Comments
He was reconsecrated bishop by Bishop Williamson, who belongs to a priestly society parallel to the Church known as the Resistencia. And the archbishop to this day has never denied this fact.
The context analyzed then must be in accordance with the Code of Canon Law of Functions of Ecclesiastical Office on the Society founded by Wiliianson, which there is information that he himself has consecrated four bishops since his departure from the Society of St. Pius X, and will continue without this canonical regularization logically.
This is clearly as an opposition to the same reformed Code of 1983:
"It is not permissible for any bishop to consecrate another bishop unless he is previously informed of the pontifical mandate (1013)".
Moreover, "without canonical provision, no ecclesiastical office can be validly obtained(146)" from the episcopal consecrations performed by him. Only the Supreme Pontiff freely appoints bishops or confirms them (377); In the case of Williamson, there is no authority or power to confer anything in the Church, nor in the sacrament to another. That is why it implies disobedience to the Pontiff himself on his par (80).
And the archbishop shows contempt for the gift he received, episcopal grace, at the hands of Pope John Paul II himself, who made him a bishop. And all the authority of the Roman Pontiffs and even the validity of all the sacraments in the Church which he received.
It is worth noting that number 845 in the Code of Canon Law says below:
"The sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation and Holy Orders, since they imprint character, cannot be repeated."
[more]
And Viganò clearly demonstrates total adherence to this same canonical disobedience of both the English bishop and the other bishops of St. Pius X. Moreover, he seeks the same example of canonical irregularity with a foundation in a Church parallel to the canonical Church, separating from the latter.
It is good to remember that any gesture of Bergoglio, with an illegitimate pontificate according to Canon 332,2, cannot confer any regularization, according to the Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, articles 76 and 77.
Therefore, here is the most faithful analysis possible of facts that cannot be disregarded, not carried away by preferences about this or that person; but turned only to the truth of Christ and his Church.