Skip to main content

Archbishop Viganò: ‘False prophet’ Bergoglio is guilty of ‘all-out apostasy’ 'We have all sorts of hair-splitting about the distinctions between formal and material heresy, none of which do the least thing to impede Bergoglio’s destructive action,' Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò said on Saturday.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archbishop-vigano-false-prophet-bergoglio-is-guilty-of-full-blown-apostasy/

Comments

Anonymous said…
Amen!
An Imperfect Council!
Now!

Ivan
9:42 PM
Anonymous said…
Archbishop Viganò does not demonstrate a solution against Bergoglio; he, however, poses a palliative, something parallel to the same Bergoglio.

He justifies this through the creation of his Catholic foundation, similar to the Society of St. Pius X, but without a canonical link with Rome. This means a contempt for any different initiative on the part of other members of the Church.

This is a clear distance from the popes because he presents them as revolutionaries at Vatican II, without showing a more respectful and profound analysis of them, who did not dogmatically define the same council at all.

His view remains always negative.

And he now distances himself from Catholic commentators with positive suggestions for saving the papacy.

The archbishop also distances himself from the faith because he does not mention it once in the article. He thus comes to a grim conclusion: nothing can prevent the destruction of the papacy.

The archbishop's faith, therefore, is bound up with the Sabbath.

.
12:31 PM
Anonymous said…
The Universi Dominici Gregis is like a sun that drives away all the darkness of the night.

https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_22021996_universi-dominici-gregis.html
12:55 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more