Skip to main content

@LauraLoomer..Everyone can get their hopes up all they want about free speech..but if @X doesn’t have ad revenue they won’t be able to survive as a company and will be forced to file for Chapter 11 BANKRUPTCY...

Everyone can get their hopes up all they want about free speech in an election year, but if doesn’t have ad revenue they won’t be able to survive as a company and will be forced to file for Chapter 11 BANKRUPTCY. I was invited to the panel today for ’s space but he deliberately kept silencing me when I asked to speak despite asking me to “be on the panel”. It’s obvious he won’t allow me to speak or even ask the question I wanted to ask. Everyone saw it happen 5 times. It wasn’t just a glitch. It was deliberate. So I will ask my question here. And maybe Elon will answer since I was dropped 5 times every time I raised my hand in the SPACE I WAS ASKED TO SPEAK IN. My question: if the financial health of X continues to decline due to advertisers dropping X, and if X is forced to file for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the next 3 to 5 months (as they are on track to do with continued financial decline), who will control X and will the same free speech policies apply into the 2024 election? What happens to X’s free speech policy if X is made to file for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy? Do you plan on filing for bankruptcy, and if so, how will you safeguard free speech on X? Thanks for not allowing me to speak, as you engagement farmed my 700,000 followers. Very dishonest of you. Don’t ask me to join ANY MORE of your spaces ever again. Because once you burn a bridge with me there is no going back. Hope to get an answer from you on this . You can see I had my hand up but I was intentionally silenced and dropped every time I tried to ask you in the Space.
Image
Image

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...