Skip to main content

Catholic Conclave: DJ priest at WYD satirised traditional priests in betting advert... "Father Guilherme Peixoto is the protagonist of a new campaign by the bookmaker Betclic"

19 hours ago — Father Guilherme Peixoto is the protagonist of a new campaign by the bookmaker Betclic. Known for being a DJ, the priest from Póvoa de Varzim ...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bergoglio is a John the Baptist in reverse because he announces the coming of someone or something different. It clearly demonstrates the need to prepare for this distinct system with its own mindset and agenda. Their works and actions are consistent with something or someone in order to dominate everything and sit in God's chair, but not being God.

In this way it is difficult for Bergoglio to be one of the 40 antipopes who have passed through history. Because it was never known that the antipopes changed any comma in Catholic doctrine by usurping the Chair of Peter. And much less is there a logic that he is more of a Pope Honorius I who was convicted of heresy, although the fathers of the First Vatican Council, in the discursion before the dogmatic proclamation of the pope's infallibility, were categorical in stating that he was condemned more for neglect, complicity and non-formal heresy because of Arius' errors in his reign.

They soon came to the conclusion that both the antecedents of Pope Honorius I and after him had the charism of infallibility.

Renato
11:44 AM
Anonymous said…
Bergoglio is the prophet who wants the future generation to welcome everything, but without questioning the synodal Church that is coming. It was not only the young people of WYD who fell into this fallacy with their own immaturity, but many adults with their slogans and more self-righteous than Catholic tendencies...

Renato
12:12 PM
Anonymous said…
Pope Honorius I also, in order to be clear that he had the charism of Peter.

Renato
12:21 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more