5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits
Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
Comments
In this way it is difficult for Bergoglio to be one of the 40 antipopes who have passed through history. Because it was never known that the antipopes changed any comma in Catholic doctrine by usurping the Chair of Peter. And much less is there a logic that he is more of a Pope Honorius I who was convicted of heresy, although the fathers of the First Vatican Council, in the discursion before the dogmatic proclamation of the pope's infallibility, were categorical in stating that he was condemned more for neglect, complicity and non-formal heresy because of Arius' errors in his reign.
They soon came to the conclusion that both the antecedents of Pope Honorius I and after him had the charism of infallibility.
Renato
Renato
Renato