Darkest and Most Ridiculous Part of the Biden DOJ’s Latest Trump Indictment... "...indictment begins with the false, absurd & legally irrelevant claim that Trump made 'knowingly false claims' about the 2020 election... because supposed '[Deep State] experts' told him the election wasn’t stolen"
This May Be the Darkest and Most Ridiculous Part of ...
| |
REVOLVER NEWS EXCLUSIVE: | |
This May Be the Darkest and Most Ridiculous Part of the Biden DOJ’s Latest Trump Indictment | |
| |
Last week, Biden’s corrupt and weaponized DOJ just issued Trump’s third and most serious criminal indictment. The formal charges of “conspiracy to defraud the United States” do an underwhelmingly half-hearted job of disguising the obvious purpose of the indictment, which is to codify the “disinformation” scam into criminal law generally, and specifically, to criminalize what we might call “election denial”. Indeed, there’s a reason the indictment begins with the false, absurd and legally irrelevant claim that Trump made “knowingly false claims” about the 2020 election that “created an intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger” and eroded “public faith in the administration of the election.”
... To prove that Trump “knowingly lied” the DOJ resorts to one of the darkest and most ridiculous slight-of-hand tricks imaginable: assuming that Trump must have known better because supposed “experts” told him the election wasn’t stolen. Yes, you read that right. The basis of the DOJ’s allegation that Trump actually believed he lost the election despite his public statements is the fact that other individuals, in many cases individuals in the intelligence community, told him so. If that isn’t absurd enough, take a look at the experts whom the DOJ deems so unimpeachably authoritative that for them simply to tell Trump “oh no the election was fair and square, nothing to see here” is enough to assume Trump believed them: ...
| |
|
Comments