Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...


Comments
"What makes this temperature hoax so serious is that it is used to prove alleged man-made global warming, a narrative that globalists use to impose on the governments and populations of the world a total restructuring of society and our lives."
Therefore, this is a restart to the global system in the same absurd line in the narrative that gases released by cows cause CO2, something also misleading.
https://www.coletividade-evolutiva.com.br/2023/07/mapas-climaticos-manipulados-para-enganar-e-manter-o-golpe-da-falacia-do-aquecimento-global.html